03.02.2017 Views

Regional Markets

56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR

56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Markets</strong> for Local Development<br />

Through producer networks, Fairtrade is providing a platform for producers to advocate<br />

their case and lobby their respective governments. Even though this is an initiative<br />

in its early phase, the goal is to ensure that by participating in the Fairtradevalue chain,<br />

producers can better influence governance processes at the local, regional and international<br />

levels.<br />

Producer and consumer prices<br />

Fairtrade is based on close relationship between producers and consumers. While producers<br />

participate in the process of setting the Fairtrade minimum price level, consumers<br />

and Fairtrade buyers choose to support the system by paying this premium<br />

price in final retail.An example from the general market for coffee serves to illustrate<br />

this point. As noted by Giovannucci and Koekoek (2003) (in Nelson and Pound<br />

2009), the ‘coffee commodity market is driven exclusively by economic factors and,<br />

like all commodity markets, does not recognise, much less internalise into its prices,<br />

the very real environmental and social costs of production’. Fairtrade is a response to<br />

this set-up of the marketplace.It seeks to ensure that producers in developing countries<br />

are able to ‘trade themselves out of poverty’ by receiving fair and stable producer<br />

prices for their products.<br />

The Fairtrade guaranteed minimum price is particularly important when market prices<br />

fall below production costs. With the safety net of a fixed fair price, farmers do not<br />

have to migrate to seek alternative employment or use up valuable savings and assets<br />

during periods of hardship.For example, in West Africa, the Fairtrade minimum prices<br />

for cotton seed have been significantly higher than state prices for conventional cotton<br />

(27–49% higher for conventional cotton and up to 76% higher for organic cotton).<br />

Fairtrade cotton producers have received significantly higher prices than producers in<br />

the region that are not certified (Nelson and Smith 2011).<br />

Arnould et al. (2006: 21)conclude that ’participation in Fairtrade is like a life jacket,<br />

a shock absorber, or a buffer against the effects of the volatility global market capitalism<br />

exert on the poor in developing countries...but...Fairtrade alone is not the solution<br />

to the problems of the rural poor’. Fairtrade must continue to evolve and adapt<br />

to the new realities on the ground. While the minimum price is an iconic component<br />

of the system and will continue to play a crucial role for many commodities, how it<br />

could best serve different products, different regionsand different farmers should be<br />

explored further.<br />

Some studies have shown that non-Fairtrade farmers are also benefitting from the<br />

increased prices as a result of the competition for the produce induced by Fairtrade<br />

(see Jaffee 2007). This is an example of a ‘multiplier effect’, increased producer prices<br />

116

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!