Regional Markets
56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR
56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Markets</strong> for Local Development<br />
Through producer networks, Fairtrade is providing a platform for producers to advocate<br />
their case and lobby their respective governments. Even though this is an initiative<br />
in its early phase, the goal is to ensure that by participating in the Fairtradevalue chain,<br />
producers can better influence governance processes at the local, regional and international<br />
levels.<br />
Producer and consumer prices<br />
Fairtrade is based on close relationship between producers and consumers. While producers<br />
participate in the process of setting the Fairtrade minimum price level, consumers<br />
and Fairtrade buyers choose to support the system by paying this premium<br />
price in final retail.An example from the general market for coffee serves to illustrate<br />
this point. As noted by Giovannucci and Koekoek (2003) (in Nelson and Pound<br />
2009), the ‘coffee commodity market is driven exclusively by economic factors and,<br />
like all commodity markets, does not recognise, much less internalise into its prices,<br />
the very real environmental and social costs of production’. Fairtrade is a response to<br />
this set-up of the marketplace.It seeks to ensure that producers in developing countries<br />
are able to ‘trade themselves out of poverty’ by receiving fair and stable producer<br />
prices for their products.<br />
The Fairtrade guaranteed minimum price is particularly important when market prices<br />
fall below production costs. With the safety net of a fixed fair price, farmers do not<br />
have to migrate to seek alternative employment or use up valuable savings and assets<br />
during periods of hardship.For example, in West Africa, the Fairtrade minimum prices<br />
for cotton seed have been significantly higher than state prices for conventional cotton<br />
(27–49% higher for conventional cotton and up to 76% higher for organic cotton).<br />
Fairtrade cotton producers have received significantly higher prices than producers in<br />
the region that are not certified (Nelson and Smith 2011).<br />
Arnould et al. (2006: 21)conclude that ’participation in Fairtrade is like a life jacket,<br />
a shock absorber, or a buffer against the effects of the volatility global market capitalism<br />
exert on the poor in developing countries...but...Fairtrade alone is not the solution<br />
to the problems of the rural poor’. Fairtrade must continue to evolve and adapt<br />
to the new realities on the ground. While the minimum price is an iconic component<br />
of the system and will continue to play a crucial role for many commodities, how it<br />
could best serve different products, different regionsand different farmers should be<br />
explored further.<br />
Some studies have shown that non-Fairtrade farmers are also benefitting from the<br />
increased prices as a result of the competition for the produce induced by Fairtrade<br />
(see Jaffee 2007). This is an example of a ‘multiplier effect’, increased producer prices<br />
116