03.02.2017 Views

Regional Markets

56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR

56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Markets</strong> for Local Development<br />

political instability, or price shocks on the global market (e.g., low maize prices or high<br />

energy prices)—the food security of the rural poor can be severely threatened.<br />

The Rift Valley region, one of the most fertile areas in Kenya, is home to a fourth of<br />

the country’s population and a major production centre for the maize and dairy subsectors.<br />

It accounts for about 80% of the country’s total maize harvest and is also home<br />

to more than half of all dairy cattle (FAO 2011). The development of market-oriented<br />

agricultural production in Kenya can be roughly divided in three phases: immediately<br />

after independence (1967–1978), the structural adjustment period (1979–2002), and<br />

the agricultural reforms since 2003.<br />

Before independence, the agricultural sector was dominated by large-scale settler<br />

estates, which produced for export markets. After independence, the newly established<br />

administration sought to include more indigenous Kenyans in commercial agriculture<br />

(including market-oriented dairy). This period saw the rise of organised smallholders,<br />

as large estates were broken up and divided among local farmers. The government<br />

intervened directly: cooperatives were established, services and inputs for farmers were<br />

subsidised, and large purchasing and marketing parastatal enterprises came to life.<br />

The next phase saw a different approach; the government took a step back and followed<br />

a hands-off strategy in favour of private sector actors. The so-called Structural<br />

Adjustment Policies (SAPs) promoted the privatisation of state-owned enterprises as<br />

well as the reduction and easing of government regulation. These measures were aimed<br />

at promoting competition and the participation of private sector actors; however, they<br />

had some long-term negative effects (FAO 2011). Governmental budgetary allocation<br />

for agricultural support dropped from 10% to 3%, and many cooperatives collapsed.<br />

The internal market became much more volatile and producer prices towards the end<br />

of the period fell to all time lows (dropping as much as 50%). Corruption was rife<br />

among multiple levels of the administration, as key inputs (such as fertiliser) became<br />

hotly desired commodities on the thriving informal black market. Private millers<br />

and middlemen took advantage of the decreasing purchasing power of the parastatal<br />

National Cereals and Produce Board (NCPB) and Kenyan Co-operative Creameries<br />

(KCC). The SAP policies were not very popular with smallholders, and often have<br />

been blamed for the weakening of the cooperatives and the drop in producer prices<br />

(Rono 2002). These are the challenges hampering the development of the smallholder<br />

maize and milk sectors.<br />

Since 2003, there has been a period of renewed reforms in agricultural policy, spurred<br />

by the revival of some market-stabilisation mechanism (e.g., the rebirth of the new-<br />

KCC). There are some visible results, like the tripling of milk production in the formal<br />

sectors between 2002 and 2007, but the system still suffers from many weaknesses<br />

(FAO 2011). NGOMA arose in the midst of this revival in 2002. It has focused on<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!