Regional Markets
56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR
56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1 Introduction<br />
in this publication the triple bottom line of sustainable development (social, environmental<br />
and economic impact) (Slaper and Hall 2011). 2 We will also touch upon the<br />
concept of power: what role does power have both in and outside the value chain?<br />
Limitations of export value chains<br />
Even when local small-scale farmers, traders and processors do profit from accessing an<br />
export market, those actors most vulnerable at the base of the chain are usually left out.<br />
Inclusion can have positive indirect effects on income through the local labour market<br />
(Neven et al. 2008); however, the direct effects on incomes of the poorest sections<br />
of society remain limited (Béné et al. 2010). Usually the rich farmers are those most<br />
often involved in value chains, cash cropping and exporting (see Neven et al. 2008; Rao<br />
and Qaim 2010). Poor farmers do secure some benefits, although without sustainable<br />
impact on improved landownership, income increases and price stability (Minten et al.<br />
2009). The average, poor farmers usually do not dare to experiment with new methods<br />
or new crops because of the risks involved. A bad harvest could mean the end of<br />
their family business and the main source of their sustenance. Usually the very poor<br />
do not even have the resources to farm commercially, lacking access to land, inputs,<br />
additional technologies, wage labourers and other elements. They do not have strong<br />
networks that can assist them in transforming their livelihood along commercial lines,<br />
and sometimes lack access to knowledge to select the strategy for the prevailing market<br />
conditions. Even when rich and very rich farmers engage in value chains and export<br />
projects, they may face enormous challenges. The number of farmers and smallholders<br />
with averaged-sized farms participating in export often drops over time, especially<br />
when prices are low. Large-scale farmers, who reap the benefits of economies of scale,<br />
tend to take over much of the innovation rent in the market (see Vorley et al. 2007;<br />
Swinnen and Maertens 2007). In some cases, smallholders are forced to sell their land<br />
to larger estates and become labourers on these holdings.<br />
As internationally operating actors aim to increase their control over the value chains<br />
for sustained profit, crop producers in developing countries are often marginalised.<br />
International competition greatly increases the risks faced by local producers in the<br />
South, both for domestic and export markets. An example is the pastoral small stock<br />
export chain to Saudi Arabia, in which East African small-scale producers were pushed<br />
out of the market by large-scale producers from New Zealand in the mid-1990s and<br />
again in the mid-2000s (Zaal 1998; El Dirani et al. 2009).<br />
2 This concept is also known as the triple P model (people, planet and profit) and was first coined by John<br />
Elkington. For more information please visit the website of SustAinability, a think tank and strategic advisory firm cofounded<br />
by John Elkington, which works to catalyse business leadership on sustainability (http://www.sustainability.com).<br />
13