03.02.2017 Views

Regional Markets

56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR

56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 Opportunities for development<br />

seem to contribute to smallholder needs based on a sustainable value chain development<br />

focus. Looking at the position of the non-food commodity cases of coffee and<br />

cotton as ‘Medium’ means that these projects have advanced somewhat towards promoting<br />

a broader definition of sustainability. C:AVA and FoSHol are taking steps in<br />

that direction. It seems that currently none of the projects is nearing full sustainability.<br />

Figure 4.8 innovation<br />

Cotton ZIM<br />

Foshol<br />

TAHA<br />

ZIM banana<br />

Coffee TZ<br />

FT<br />

NGOMA<br />

RUDI<br />

LOW<br />

HIGH<br />

Senegal<br />

C:AVA<br />

Fig 4.8 shows the importance that the projects attached to innovation.<br />

Figure 4.9 Economic sustainability<br />

RUDI<br />

NGOMA<br />

C:AVA<br />

TAHA<br />

ZIM banana<br />

Coffee TZ<br />

FT<br />

LOW<br />

HIGH<br />

Foshol<br />

Senegal<br />

Cotton ZIM<br />

Fig 4.9 illustrates the extent to which the projects’ interventions contributed to smallholder needs based on a<br />

sustainable value chain development focus.<br />

Value for smallholders: <strong>Regional</strong> food commodity value chains<br />

After the analysis of the different categories of impact across the various case studies of<br />

local value chain projects, it is time now to turn back to the theory. The Value Chains<br />

as a concept (initially mostly in a manufacturing context) has its theoretical roots in<br />

the works of Gereffi, Humphrey and other authors. Especially the work of Gereffi et<br />

159

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!