03.02.2017 Views

Regional Markets

56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR

56ec00c44c641_local-markets-book_complete_LR

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Regional</strong> <strong>Markets</strong> for Local Development<br />

al. (2005) was a seminal piece that established a set of possible models for structuring<br />

value chains. Several variables were outlined as crucial for determining the path of<br />

development of the value chain: the complexity of transactions taking place between<br />

actors in the chain, the codification of these transactions, and the capabilities of the<br />

actors in the supply base.<br />

When one considers local markets, regional value chains, food commodity crops and<br />

small-scale producers, the expectation is to find relatively simple and well codified<br />

transactions as well as high supply capacity. In other words, a large number of producers<br />

engaged with a large number of traders and processors in a market-based (or spot<br />

market) model of a value chain (see also Chapter 2). This multiplicity of actors was also<br />

observed in the field cases, even though sometimes only a limited number of traders,<br />

processors and/or well-organised farmers groups was involved at the procuring end of<br />

the chains.<br />

However, the theory does not accommodate this variety. Gereffi et al. provide for only<br />

one model of governance where the complexity of transactions is low and the ability for<br />

codification high. They do not provide for a case where the complexity of transactions is<br />

low, but where there is no tendency for codification, as in an agricultural spot market for<br />

food commodities in a local/regional market in Africa. The rest of their argumentation<br />

is based on analysis of situations where there is only one or a few turn-key suppliers of<br />

a certain product, i.e. a (quasi-) monopoly. In such situation one can indeed standardise<br />

(codify) production processes to make transactions less complex (vertical chain coordination).<br />

This reflects their orientation towards industrial production processes.<br />

In agricultural chains in Africa, the conditions are far more diverse. Theoretically, this<br />

is breaking new ground in this area: not only are there many customers who are dealing<br />

with producers at spot markets, but also numerous traders/processors, positioned<br />

at different points along the chain with various degrees of control. We have seen that<br />

there is a systematic difference between the cases that are more narrowly focused on<br />

food commodities and those that are more focused on food cash crop commodities. The<br />

‘governance matrix’ (see Table 1.1) together with the graphs/figures presented in this<br />

chapter after each section describing the different dimensions (gender, food security,<br />

innovation, etc.) form the basis of the discussion we will present here (see Figure 4.10).<br />

160

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!