10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xxxiv<br />

(ix) Whether selection in excess of number of posts advertised<br />

is valid? – No - Vacant posts arising or expected should be<br />

notified inviting applications from all eligible candidates to<br />

be considered for their selection in accordance with their<br />

merit - Appointing persons from the waiting list to the<br />

vacancies arisen subsequently without being notified is<br />

unconstitutional.<br />

(x) Selection by conducting interviews - Whether allegation<br />

with regard to conduct of interview tenable? – No -<br />

Regarding the allegation that select list has not been<br />

published in the newspaper as per Rules, it is only<br />

irregularity and not illegality - Merely because some of the<br />

selected candidates are relatives of the Ministers and<br />

politicians by itself cannot lead to the inference that<br />

selection is vitiated.<br />

(xi) Haryana Civil <strong>Service</strong> (Executive Branch) and Allied<br />

<strong>Service</strong>s and Other <strong>Service</strong>s, Common/Combined<br />

Examination Act (4 of 2002), S. 1 – Validity – Act<br />

repealing circulars, basis of Supreme Court decisions in<br />

AIR 1999 SC 1701 : 1999 AIR SCW 1327 : 1999 Lab IC<br />

1838 (Virender S.Hooda’s case) and C.A.No.7422 of<br />

1999, D/- 9-11-2000 (reported in 2002 (10)SCC 549)<br />

(Sandeep Singh’s case) – Not ultra vires, except to the<br />

extent it takes away appointments already made in<br />

implementation of Supreme Court decision much before<br />

enforcement of Act.<br />

(xii) Whether rounding of marks permissible – No. It may be a<br />

case of extreme hardship but no relaxation against the rules<br />

is possible.<br />

(xiii) Quota rule as between direct recruits and promotees - Can<br />

promotees to Gazetted <strong>Service</strong> avoid consultation with<br />

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission? – No. Direct recruits cannot<br />

claim appointment from date of vacancy in quota before<br />

their selection.<br />

(xiv) Fixing of eligibility criteria is the prerogative of the<br />

Government and the Court cannot interfere with the same.<br />

(xv) Having allowed themselves to be interviewed in<br />

accordance with the stipulated selection criteria the same<br />

candidates cannot be allowed to challenge the selection<br />

process on their having been declared unsuccessful at the<br />

test.<br />

(xvi) Whether notification can contain instructions which are not<br />

provided for in the Rules? – Yes, as long as they are in<br />

accordance with the rules.<br />

193 to 207<br />

216 to 229<br />

264 to 266<br />

271 to 274<br />

289 to 324<br />

382<br />

402 to 411<br />

415 to 419

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!