Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

(vi) There is no Fiduciary relationship between the Subject 759 to 763
Experts and the Commission so far as the examination is
concerned - As the candidate has no objection for
furnishing the information, it cannot be refused on the
ground that it is personal information.
Chapter-XV Selection by Chairman alone; Conduct of dissenting
Members of P.S.C.
(i) Whether selection made by Chairman alone could be said
to be a selection by P.S.C.? - No. The Commission did
not delegate functions to the Chairman nor did the
Commission approve the selection - The selection of
respondent No.3 made by the Chairman, the only Member
of the Commission sitting at the interview was not a
selection done by the Public Service Commission - The
appointment of 3 rd Selection by Chairman alone; Conduct of dissenting
Members of P.S.C.
respondent was bad.
627 to 645
(ii) Conduct of dissenting Members publicly criticizing the 338 to 374
majority decision of the Commission was deprecated.
Being bound by majority of opinion no member of the
group is entitled to publicly criticise the decision on the
strength of his personal views. A Member whose kin is a
candidate is not debarred from participating in the
meetings in which general policy decisions are required to
be taken. His disability is limited to his participation at the
stage where the merit of his ward has to be judged.
Chapter-XVI Review of Order Review of Order
(i) Power and scope of Review - Review Application has a 59 to 61
very narrow scope and is allowed only if there is an error
apparent on the face of the record or if some new fact is
discovered after due diligence. No scope of fresh grounds
and fresh arguments.
xlv