Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Manipur PSC
5. In para 14 and 15 of the above affidavit it has been stated the certified copy of the Rules and
Regulations mentioned and demanded at (c) of Para 1, will be available from the Government Press
and if the appellant wanted she can do so on payment of Rs.2 per page from the office of M.P.S.C.
6. The respondent no 1 has claimed exemption from supplying marks sheets of other candidates
and more under sub section (d) of Section 8 of the R.T.I. Act in response to the demand of the
appellant at (d) and (e) of para 1. Further, in respect of the information at (f) of para 1, the respondents
have submitted that there is no such rule and Regulations for re-evaluation, or reassessment and such
and as such M.P.S.C. cannot supply anything which is not in existence.
7. In her written application dated 14 th September 2007 the appellant still insisted on the
information at (b), (d) and also reasons for not having information at (f),
8. After due notice to the parties the hearing of the case was held on 25.9.2007, 3.10.2007,
9.10.2007, 16.10.2007 and 27.10.2007 in which the parties were present along with their Ld counsels.
Regarding the information demanded by appellant at (a) Para 1, there is no dispute as the information
had been supplied to her, a copy of which is also annexed as R1 in the Affidavit dated 3.10.2007 of
the respondents. In connection with the information at (b) Para 1, the required information has been
furnished at Paras no.10, 11, 12 and 13 of the affidavit dated 3 rd October 2007 of the respondents.
Regarding the information sought at (c) in Para 1, the respondents had indicated the notification after
the lapse of the stipulated period of thirty days, therefore, the information has to be supplied free of
charge under Section 7(6) of the R.T.I. Act 2005.
9. In respect of the information at (d) and (e), of Para 1, which are reproduced below-
“(d) a certified copy of the statement of marks of all the successful candidates with the
marks obtained by them in the written examination and Viva-voce that was displayed on
the notice board of the M.P.S.C. Office.
(e) a certified copy of the statement of comparison between myself with at least 2(two)
successful candidates preferably who had taken the same Optional papers giving separately
the marks obtained in each of the Optional subjects, General Studies, essay and the
marks assessed according to the factors and characteristics (specially stating them)
separately;”
The Commission does not agree to the contention of the respondents that it falls under the exemption
clauses as provided at sub section (d) of Section 8 of the Act which is as follows:
757