Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

162
applicant in OA.No.238/2007 could not come up for selection as the applicant secured only 581.3
marks. It if further contended that out of 235 vacancies of MPDOs notified in General Recruitment
and 7 vacancies notified under Limited Recruitment, about 14 vacancies are reserved for BC’D’
(General) are concerned there are 9 (2 carry forward + 7) vacancies for BC’D’ General in Multi
Zone-I and 5 vacancies in Multi Zone-II. All these vacancies were filled and details are hereunder:
1
2
MZ-I MZ-II
Reg.No. Marks Regn.No. Marks
11902771
selected against
CF vacancy
12231501
selected against
CF vacancy
Andhra Pradesh PSC
659
643
1
2
12229186
12228602
607
602
3 10204971 608.5 3 12204169 602
4 10700100 608 4 12241495 602
5 10204422 608 5 11300058 601
6 10201364 608
7 10103816 608
8 10100323 603
9 12201225 603
The 2 BC’D’ carry forward vacancies pertains to earlier recruitment and they were filled first and
the candidates so selected are placed above the candidates selected against the vacancies belonging
to the current recruitment. It is further contended that naturally the candidates selected against carry
forward vacancies are higher in merit than the candidates selected against open competition vacancies
of current recruitment. Hence, the OAs are devoid of merit and liable to be dismissed.
12. The Commission filed additional affidavit contending that sub rule 2(g) of Rule 22 of General
Rules contemplates a Limited Recruitment for unfilled vacancies. In the case where candidates belonging
to reserved groups are not available even after conducting limited recruitment, it is open to the
Government to relax reservation rules and fill such vacancies by open competition candidates. In such
an event, equal number of vacancies had to be reserved in the next general recruitment and only
candidates selected against such vacancies can be appointed first before appointing the candidates
selected against the vacancies of the current recruitment as per sub rule h (iii) of Rule 22. the respondents