10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

674<br />

therefore clear that after the written test when the result was declared and interview cards were<br />

issued, the purpose of the written test was over and in this view of the matter, therefore, it is now open<br />

to the <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission to prepare a selection list in order of merit on the basis of marks<br />

obtained by candidates in the interview alone and without adopting any further criteria or restriction.<br />

18. The contention that for some candidates a separate Selection Board was constituted to hold<br />

interviews at Rewa although may appear to be not very satisfactory as it was done when the process<br />

of interview was on, but still in the absence of any positive allegation of mala fide no grievance could<br />

be made as it would only provide a place for interview easily accessible to candidates to a particular<br />

region.<br />

19. The interveners’ contention was that the petitioners have not joined all the candidates who<br />

have been selected and some of them have come to intervene and support the selection but it is not<br />

disputed that the list of selection is only recommendatory as the appointing authority is the State<br />

Government and so long as no appointments are made, there is no vested right in any one of the<br />

candidates and therefore the objection that all those who were selected have not been joined could<br />

not be accepted.<br />

Madhya Pradesh PSC<br />

20. In the light of the discussion above, therefore, it is not necessary to strike down the whole<br />

process. So far as the written test for purposes of finding out eligible candidates are concerned it<br />

could not be said to be bad. The petition is therefore partly allowed and it is directed that respondent<br />

No.2, the <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission, will prepare a list of candidates in order of merit on the basis of<br />

marks obtained by them at the interview in accordance with Rule 12. The Selection List published by<br />

adding up all the marks of the written test and by applying the criteria of minimum marks is held to be<br />

invalid and is quashed. It is further directed that as the process has already taken a long time, the<br />

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission will prepare the list as indicated and submit it to the Government for<br />

appointments within three months from today. Parties are directed to bear their own costs.<br />

***

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!