10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IN THE KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AT BANGALORE<br />

APPLICATION NO.7634 OF 2005<br />

D.D. 02.02.2006<br />

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.V.Srinivasa Reddy, Chairman<br />

Smt. N.K.Gayathri Devi ... Applicant<br />

Vs.<br />

The State of Karnataka & Anr. ... Respondents<br />

Recruitment :<br />

Age Limit:<br />

Applicant was a candidate for the post of lecturer in English in Govt. I Grade Colleges under G.M.<br />

category upper age limit for which was 35 years – Age relaxation of 10 years was given to candidates<br />

working in Collegiate Education – Applicant was aged 45 years 4 months 12 days as on the last date for<br />

receipt of applications – Hence her application was rejected as over aged – As the applicant was not eligible<br />

for selection even after relaxation up to 10 years was given – Hence the application was dismissed.<br />

Held:<br />

Karnataka PSC<br />

Considering the facts a direction by way of mandamus either to relax the age limit or any such<br />

direction which would violate the terms and conditions of the notification cannot be given.<br />

ORDER<br />

In this application, the applicant is seeking a direction to declare the non-calling of the applicant for<br />

interview to the post of Lecturer in English as arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14 and<br />

16 of the Constitution and for a consequential direction to the respondents to treat the applicant as<br />

eligible for selection and appointment by providing relaxation of marks 1% for each year of part-time<br />

service under clause 2.2 and to extend all benefits.<br />

2. Heard Mr.Ranganath, S.Jois, learned Counsel for the applicant, Mr. M.L.N. Reddy, leaned<br />

Government Pleader for the 1st respondent and Mr.T.Narayana Swamy, learned Counsel for the 2nd respondent.<br />

3. It is undisputed that the applicant was a candidate for selection to the post of Lecturer in<br />

English having applied for the said post pursuant to the notification dated 12.7.2005 issued by the 2nd respondent for selection of Lecturers in First Grade Colleges. In the annexure appended to the said<br />

notification, clause 2.3 prescribes “maximum age limit” for candidates belonging to ‘general merit’ as<br />

35 years, candidates belonging to category 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B as 38 years and for candidates belonging<br />

to SC/ST and category I as 40 years. However, candidates who have been working in the Collegiate<br />

Education are entitled for relaxation of maximum age up to 10 years. Since the applicant was not<br />

called for interview in terms of the notification, she has presented the application for the reliefs sought herein.<br />

425

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!