Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

756
(f) a copy of the Rules and Regulations/procedures to be followed for applying for reevaluation,
if any, if not why there is no procedure or Rules and Regulations
established for the same.”
2. Having not received any response from the S.P.I.O. within the stipulated time, the petitioner
filed a petition to this Commission on 18 th August 2007, which was taken up as a complaint under
Section 18 of the R.T.I. Act 2005. The comments have ben called from the respondents, giving ten
days time vide letter no. appeal cse no 59 of 2007 dated the 20 th August, 2007. the S.P.I.O./
M.P.S.C. in his letter No.7/20/200-MPSC(DR))(Pt) dated 24 th August 2007 stated “that in compliance
with the interim direction dated 30.07.2007 passed by the Hon’ble Gauhati High Court in Writ Petition
(C) No.564 of 2007 (S.Pratibimba Singh and others –vs- the State of Manipur and others), the
answer scripts of all candidates appeared in the MCSCCE (Main), 2005 and also the Interview
sheets in respect of the Personality test/Viva-voce have been kept under sealed cover. At present,
any attempt to open the sealed cover will amount to the violation of the direction of the Hon’ble High
Court. Therefore, the Commission may consider the petition of Smt. Atom Niroda Devi, Roll No.6332
after obtaining a final verdict from the court relating to the Writ Petition mentioned above.”
3. On 29 th August 2007, the complainant has submitted a rejoinder stating that the information
sought at (c), (d) and (f) as mentioned at Para no 1 be provided as these do not violate the order
30.7.2007 of the Hon’ble High Court, the information at (a), (b) and (e) may be provided as soon as
the disposal of the W.P.(C) No 564 of 2007 of the vacation of the interim order dated 30.7.2007
whichever is earlier.
4. In his affidavit dated 3 rd October 2007, the respondent no.1 has submitted that the information
as demanded in (a) of Para 1 has been furnished as Annexure R/1, which is inclusive of the viva-voce
marks secured by the appellant, which had been supplied to all the successful candidates. Regarding
the viva-voce marks, it is usually done by all the members of the day of interview on consensus
approach/conclusion then and there to enter marks so arrived at/on among the members in favour of
every candidate who had been interviewed. And the present appellant secured 105 marks and the
same is entered in her marks sheet. There is no other formality or separate mark sheet system for
every member of the interview. It has been assured that the relevant interview sheet signed by all the
members relating to her case and the cases of other who appeared on that day during that particular
shift i.e. “Morning Shift” will be available to her at any moment after the sealing of the Hon’ble High
Court is lifted.
Manipur PSC