10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

92<br />

12. We need not dilate much on this subject with regard to the retrospective operation of the<br />

procedural laws. Right from Colonial Sugar Refining Company Ltd. Vs. Irving upto Shiva Shakti<br />

Cooperative Housing Society, Nagpur vs. Swaraj Developers, it is well settled that the statue relating<br />

to substantive right is presumed to be prospective, unless it is expressly or by necessary implication<br />

made to have retrospective effect. However, while statute concerning with the matters on procedure<br />

or evidence which is declaratory in nature is construed to be retrospective unless there is a clear<br />

indication that such is not the intention of the Legislature. The Supreme Court was categoric in laying<br />

down the principle that no person has a vested right in course of procedure. He has only the right of<br />

proceeding in the matter prescribed. If by a statute change, the mode of procedure is altered, the<br />

parties are to proceed according to the altered mode, without exception, unless there is a different<br />

stipulation. The Full bench of this Court in Motichand Jain v. M.Jaikumar after considering the copious<br />

case law on the subject observed as follows:<br />

Andhra Pradesh PSC<br />

“From the above, it is obvious that when a repeal of an enactment is followed by a<br />

fresh legislation, such legislation does not affect the substantive rights of the parties unless<br />

such legislation is retrospective. However, the position of law would be different when it<br />

relates to procedural law which is presumed to be retrospective unless it is otherwise<br />

provided for in the Act.”<br />

13. In the instant case, the recruitment is required to be confined to the procedure laid down in<br />

G.O.P.No.763 GAD dated 15.11.1975. The said G.O. was issued by the Government to meet the<br />

requirement under the A.P. <strong>Public</strong> Employment Organisation of Local Cadre and Regulation of Direct<br />

Recruitment Order, 1975 (hereinafter called the “Presidential Order”) issued in G.O.Ms.No.674 dated<br />

20.10.1975. The said G.O. contemplates recruitment of candidates under two type namely single unit<br />

i.e. single cadre recruitment and multi unit i.e. multi cadre recruitment. In these batches of cases, we<br />

are only concerned with the multiple cadre recruitment. The procedure for recruitment to multi cadre<br />

posts to be in tune with the Presidential Order. Para 4 is relevant which is extracted below:<br />

“4.Multiple cadre recruitment may take different forms especially in the implementation<br />

of the proposed Presidential Order on the organisation of local cadres. It may take the<br />

form of –<br />

(a) Recruitment to fill up the vacancies in a single category for different local cadres or<br />

different parts of the State (local areas) in one department e.g. recruitment of Clerks in<br />

the Judicial Department for Courts in the Districts undertaken by the Andhra Pradesh<br />

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission.<br />

(b)Recruitment to fill up the vacancies in identical or different categories in different<br />

local cadres in different departments in one part of the State (a local area) e.g. recruitment<br />

to Group-IV services undertaken by the Collectors now.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!