10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Whereas, Mr. Shah, Mr. Kapoor and Mr.Chopra, learned Counsel for the short-listed candidates<br />

contend that there is no need to redraw he merit. According to them, in case of deletion of question<br />

having printed errors/spelling mistakes and the questions which are admittedly wrong and have not<br />

been deleted, the same would change the merit position of the unsuccessful candidates including the<br />

writ petitioners. It has been submitted by them that the benefit of deletion of questions and adjustment<br />

of marks of such questions pro-rata would confer equal benefit upon all the candidates who have<br />

appeared in the papers, of which such questions are to be deleted. According to them, even if the<br />

individual merit of a candidate improves, his comparative merit position qua the other candidates of<br />

the same paper would remain the same.<br />

The question in issue is not whether petitioners’ improved merit would bring them near to the merit<br />

obtained by the last selected candidate. The issue under consideration is whether the selection of<br />

short-listed candidates is fair. Undisputedly, by deletion of more questions, the merit of the candidates,<br />

who appeared in any of the above said subject-papers, would certainly be improved.<br />

In present kind of cut-throat competitions even small fractional difference in marks matters. By<br />

alteration of merit, some unselected candidates can find place in the select list, whereas some of the<br />

selected candidates may have to go out of the same. Whether the petitioners would find place in the<br />

select list or some other unsuccessful candidates, who have not come to the Court, would be immaterial<br />

for considering the validity of the selection of selected candidates. Under law, the selection of selected<br />

candidates can be up-held only if the merit of all the candidates is found to have been fairly judged.<br />

The comparative merit of the candidates cannot be said to have been fairly drawn, because the<br />

unsuccessful candidates have been denied the benefit of the methodology adopted by the Commission<br />

for distribution of the marks of such undeleted questions, which too ought to have been deleted, as<br />

pointed out earlier.<br />

Jammu & Kashmir PSC<br />

It is true that so far as the paper of General Studies is concerned, such improvement of merit of the<br />

candidates would not matter much, as the paper was compulsory and all the candidates will be benefited<br />

alike. But, so far as the improvement of merit of the candidates of said optional subject-papers is<br />

concerned, their merit is ultimately to be compared with the short-listed candidates, and in the event of<br />

re-drawing the merit, the same can lead to the exclusion of some of the selected candidates and<br />

inclusion of some of the unsuccessful candidates. Even a fractional improvement of merit position of<br />

365

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!