10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

398<br />

Jharkhand PSC<br />

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI<br />

W.P. (S) NO.3416 OF 2007<br />

D.D. 18.10.2008<br />

Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.R.Prasad<br />

Anil Kumar Singh ... Petitioner<br />

Vs.<br />

Jharkhand P.S.C. & Ors. ... Respondents<br />

Examination:<br />

The petitioner was a candidate for selection to 5 posts of Assistant Engineer (Mechanical) in the<br />

Department of <strong>Public</strong> Health Engineering (P.H.E.D.) advertised in the year 2003 – Subsequently in<br />

2005 another advertisement was issued for selection to 8 posts of Assistant Engineer (Mechanical) in<br />

Water Resources Department, to which the petitioner was not a candidate – Common written test<br />

was held – At the fag end of the selection process a Corrigendum to the advertisement issued earlier<br />

in the year 2003 wherein vacancy for the candidates of unreserved category was shown as ‘Nil’<br />

whereas vacancies for SC, ST & OBC were shown as 1, 5 & 1 respectively – In the counter affidavit<br />

submitted by the Department that after applying post based roster on the sanctioned post of 19 it was<br />

found as against 10 posts meant for the candidates of unreserved category, 11 persons were working<br />

and therefore, vacancy as against general category was shown as ‘nil’ – Considering this fact and the<br />

fact that successful candidates who had applied for both the advertisements were asked to opt either<br />

for Water Resources Department or PHED the Court has held that there is no inherent defect in the<br />

result published wherein even applicants of the year 2005 were shown successful for the posts advertised<br />

in the year 2003 and consequently dismissed the writ petition.<br />

ORDER<br />

Pursuant to advertisement issued by Jharkhand <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission (JPSC), vide<br />

advertisement no.12 of 2002-03 inviting applications for the appointments on 5 posts of Assistant<br />

Engineer (Mechanical) in the Department of <strong>Public</strong> Health and Engineering (P.H.E.D.), the petitioner<br />

being eligible applied for the same. Subsequently in the year 2005, another advertisement was issued,<br />

vide advertisement no.8 of 2005 for the appointments on 8 posts of Assistant Engineer (Mechanical)<br />

in the Water Resources Department, to which the petitioner did not chose to apply for. However, for<br />

both the posts as advertised in the year 2003 and also in the year 2005, common written test was held<br />

and the petitioner came out successful and was called for interview on 20.3.2007. While the selection<br />

process was at its fag end, Jharkhand <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission published a corrigendum (Annexure<br />

6) to the advertisement issued earlier in the year 2003 wherein vacancy for the candidates of unreserved<br />

category was shown as ‘Nil’ whereas vacancies for SC, ST and OBC were shown as 1, 5 and 1<br />

respectively. Thereupon, results were published on 19.5.2007 wherein none of the candidates of<br />

unreserved category was shown successful which, according to learned counsel appearing for the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!