Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

160
Assistant in Multi Zone-II meant for reservation of quota of SCs with respect to the
relinquishment by the 4 th respondent to her selection to the said post and not taking
further steps in compliance of Rule 7 of Public Service Commission Rules of procedure
r/w GO.Ms.No.396, dated 1.6.77, declare the impugned action of the respondents in
not taking steps as required under Rule 7 as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the Statutory
provisions and consequently direct the respondents to select and appoint the applicant as
Senior Marketing Assistant under Multi Zone-II meant for quota earmarked for SC
reservation.”
6. In OA.No.3145/2006 the applicant prayed for the following relief:
“........ to call for the records relating to selection of the applicant as well as the
lay SC candidate with Roll No.13122974 for selection as Senior Marketing Assistant
under Multi Zone-II, declare the selection/appointment of the lady SC candidate as Senior
Marketing Assistant as irregular, illegal further being violated of Statutory provisions
governing the selection process and consequently direct the 1 st respondent to declare the
applicant as selected candidate to the post of Senior Marketing Assistant against a vacancy
meant for an SC candidate under Multi Zone-II.”
7. In OA.No.239/2007 the applicant prayed for the following relief:
“..... to call for the records relating to and connected with the selections made by the
Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission in pursuant to Notification No.21/2003 and
Supplementary Notification No.6/2004 to make recruitment to Group-I Services of the
State of Andhra Pradesh and to declare the decision of APPSC not filling up all vacancies
of Mandal Parishad Development Officer reserved to BC(D) (General) category as illegal,
arbitrary, discriminatory and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1 st respondent
to consider the applicant for appointment to the post of Mandal Parishad Development
Officer against one of the vacancies reserved to be filled by BC’D’ (General) candidates
as per his merit and rank with all consequential benefits.”
8. In OA.No.238/2007 the applicant prayed for the following relief:
“..... to call for the records relating to and connected with the selections made by the
Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission in pursuant to Notification No.21/2003 and
Supplementary Notification No.6/2004 to make recruitment to Group-I Services of the
State of Andhra Pradesh and to declare the decision of APPSC not filling up only 5
vacancies of Mandal Parishad Development Officer reserved to BC’A’ (Women)
candidates as against six vacancies reserved for them as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory
and unconstitutional and consequently direct the 1 st respondent to fill the sixth vacancy of
Mandal Parishad Development Officer reserved to be filled by BC’A’ (Women) candidate
by considering the claim of the applicant as per her merit with all consequential benefits.”
9. These OAs have been heard together as common question of law is involved and they are
being disposed of by a common order.
Andhra Pradesh PSC