Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

88
by Notification NO.10/1999 as on 30.8.2002 and fill up the same by candidates who
were selected by A.P.P.S.C. duly observing the rule of reservation.
(b) The personnel who are to be deployed and adjusted from Surplus Main Power
Cell have already been reflected in the Annexure and the total vacancy position was
arrived at after giving credit to the number of persons deployed in the direct recruitment
quota, however, if there is any surplus man power still unadjusted as on 30.8.2000, the
Government shall work out the same and deploy those personnel and the appointment
shall be made to the remaining vacancies.
(c) The persons who were promoted and posted on temporary basis or ad hoc basis
in the vacancies earmarked for direct recruitment shall be reverted back to their original
posts.
(d) The Government shall strictly observe the rule relating the ratio to be maintained
between the direct recruits and promotees in accordance with the quota prescribed in the
relevant Service Rules and neither excess intake shall be allowed to be crept in or the
deficiency is allowed to persist except in exceptional or unavoidable circumstances.
(e) The entire exercise shall be done within a period of six months from the date of
receipt of a copy of this Order.”
In pursuance of the directions of this Court, the authorities assessed 973 vacancies in executive
category and 193 vacancies in non-executive category. By this process, this became imperative for
the A.P.P.S.C. to interview some more candidates in view of the additional recruitment to the posts as
referred to above. However, A.P.P.S.C. entertained a doubt with regard to the preparation of the
merit list as to whether one merit list has to be prepared. However, this Court while stating that no
clarification was necessary, observed that only one merit list is required to be prepared in respect of
the notification No.10 of 1999. Against the said clarificatory order, the matter was again carried
before the Supreme Court in S.L.P. No.7772 of 2004 and the Supreme Court deleted the said
portion.
Andhra Pradesh PSC
4. A.P.P.S.C. started preparations for making selections, which we described second round
selections to the posts referred to above and in that process, it revised the earlier selections so as to
make the entire selections on the basis of one merit list. The said revision has the effect of distributing
the position of the already appointed candidates in 2001 and 2002 in the posts of Asst. Municipal
Commissioners, Asst. Commercial Tax Officers and Asst. Section Officers. Therefore, they filed
O.A.No.3246 of 2004 and Batch challenging the action of the A.P.P.S.C. in recruiting them to above
posts dislocating selections made earlier. Some of the O.As. were also filed questioning the selections