10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

290<br />

Further held:<br />

If it is to be held that direct recruitment can also be permitted without consulting the <strong>Service</strong><br />

Commission (in case it is required to be consulted) there will, in our opinion, be total chaos in the<br />

recruitment process and it will lead to backdoor recruitment at the whims and fancy of Government<br />

such a blanket power of relaxation of recruitment rules cannot be implied in favour of the Government.<br />

(AIR 1996 SC 2775).<br />

Held:<br />

Whether quota rule has broken down? – No<br />

Rule 5(4) of the Recruitment Rules 1978 provides that in case suitable candidates are not available<br />

for promotion, the posts shall be filled up by direct recruitment and vice-versa. Thus, there must be<br />

evidence that suitable candidates were “not available” for direct recruitment. Such non-availability<br />

cannot be inferred when, as a fact, not even a reference is made to the Commission to find out if upon<br />

advertisement, anybody will respond. Thus there is no breaking down of the quota rule.<br />

Whether adhoc/stop gap promotion of Assistant Engineers and Assistant Executive Engineers could<br />

be made beyond six months and till regularization, by Government without consulting the <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong><br />

Commission?<br />

Held:<br />

Summarising the position, we therefore hold that the ad hoc /stop gap service of the promotees<br />

cannot be treated as non-est merely because P.S.C was not consulted in respect of continuance of the<br />

ad hoc / stop gap service beyond six months. Such service is capable of being regularized under Rule<br />

23 of the J & K (CCA) Rules, 1956 and rectified with retrospective effect from the date of occurrence<br />

of a clear vacancy in the promotion quota, subject to eligibility, fitness and other relevant factors.<br />

There is no ‘rota’ rule applicable. The ‘quota’ rule has not broken down. Excess promotees occupying<br />

direct recruitment posts have to be pushed down and adjusted in later vacancies within their quota<br />

after due regularization. Such service outside promotee quota cannot count for seniority. <strong>Service</strong> of<br />

promotees which is regularized with retrospective effect from date of vacancies within quota counts<br />

for seniority. However, any part of such ad hoc / or stop gap or even regular service rendered while<br />

occupying the direct recruitment quota cannot be counted. Seniority of promotees or transferees is to<br />

be fixed as per quota and from date of commencement of probation/or regular appointment as stated<br />

above. Seniority of direct recruit is from the date of substantive appointment. Seniority has to be<br />

worked out between direct recruits or promotees for each year.<br />

Whether the direct recruits can claim retrospective date of recruitment from the date on which the<br />

direct recruitment was available, even though the direct recruit was not appointed by that date and<br />

was appointed long thereafter? – No<br />

Held:<br />

Jammu & Kashmir PSC<br />

Direct recruits cannot claim appointment from date of vacancy in quota before their selection.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!