10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

208<br />

***<br />

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT<br />

(The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and<br />

Arunachal Pradesh)<br />

W.P. (C) No.1042/2002 and W.P.(C) No.1933/2002<br />

D.D. 13.6.2002<br />

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice J N Sarma<br />

Sri (Dr) Muhi Kanta Hazarkika & Anr. ... Petitioners<br />

Vs.<br />

State of Assam & Ors. ... Respondents<br />

Qualification & Experience:<br />

Recruitment to the post of Director of Health <strong>Service</strong>s - At the time of issuing advertisement no<br />

qualification was prescribed by the Government under the Rules with regard to academic qualification<br />

and experience – While issuing advertisement qualification experience as was done in the past were<br />

prescribed – P.S.C. prepared select list placing Dr. Bipul Goswami at Sl.No.1 and Dr. Paresh<br />

Battacharee at Sl.No.2 – After receipt of the list the authority came to a decision that Dr. Goswami<br />

was not qualified to hold the post as he did not have the requisite experience – The validity of the<br />

select list was challenged – The High Court scraped the selection and sent back to the Government to<br />

lay down the qualification and experience as required under the Rules and hold selection.<br />

Held:<br />

Following the decision in (1990) 3 SCC 655 (District Collector & Chairman, Vizianagaram Social<br />

Welfare Residential School Society Vs. M.Tripura Sundari Devi) that when an advertisement mentions<br />

a particular qualification and an appointment is made in disregard of the same, it is not a matter only<br />

between the appointing authority and the appointee concerned. The aggrieved are all those who had<br />

similar or even better qualifications than the appointee or appointees but who had not applied for the<br />

post because they did not possess the qualifications mentioned in the advertisement.<br />

Cases referred:<br />

Assam PSC<br />

1. (1990) 3 SCC 655 - District Collector & Chairman. Vizianagaram Social Welfare Residential<br />

School Society Vs. M.Tripura Sundari Devi<br />

2. (1998) 3 SCC 381 - Upen Chandra Gogoi Vs. State of Assam and others<br />

ORDER<br />

Both these applications have been filed challenging the legality and validity of the select list dated<br />

29.12.2001 prepared by the Assam <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission (hereinafter referred to ‘APSC’) and<br />

communicated by its Secretary by which Dr. Bipul Ch. Goswami and Dr. Paresh Ch. Bhattacharjee<br />

were selected to fill up the post of Director of Health <strong>Service</strong>s, Assam in pursuance of the advertisement

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!