10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IN THE KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AT BANGALORE<br />

APPLICATION NO.4254 OF 2008<br />

D.D. 05.09.2008<br />

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.C.Kabbin, Judicial Member &<br />

The Hon’ble Smt. Usha Ganesh, Administrative Member<br />

Sri. Aravind ... Applicant<br />

Vs.<br />

The K.P.S.C. ... Respondent<br />

Recruitment:<br />

Age relaxation:<br />

When the Special Rules of recruitment prescribe age limit whether General Recruitment Rules<br />

prescribing the age limit and relaxation of maximum age limit is applicable? – No<br />

Recruitment of Gazetted Probationers under Karnataka Recruitment of Gazetted Probationers<br />

(Appointment by Competitive Examination) Rules, 1977, which prescribe age limit – Applicant whose<br />

application was rejected on the ground of overage sought relaxation claiming to be in-service candidate<br />

under K.C.S. (General Recruitment Rules) 1957 – KAT has dismissed the application.<br />

Held:<br />

No relaxation of upper age limit is provided under the Special Rules to the in-service candidates<br />

General Recruitment Rules providing relaxation of age to in-service candidates is not applicable.<br />

ORDER<br />

Sri. T.Narayanaswamy, Advocate, has taken notice on behalf of the Respondent – Karnataka<br />

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission.<br />

Karnataka PSC<br />

The applicant had applied for the post of a Gazetted probationer in the Karnataka Government<br />

service as per the Karnataka Recruitment of Gazetted Probationers’ (Appointment by Competitive<br />

Examinations) Rules, 1997. His application was rejected by the respondent – K.P.S.C., by endorsement<br />

in No.E(1)139/2008-09/PSC dated 7.7.2008 (Annexure-A6) and No.E(1)181/2008-09/PSC dated<br />

5.8.2008 (Annexure-A7) on the ground that he had crossed the age limit prescribed for the post.<br />

Challenging these endorsements, the applicant has approached this Tribunal.<br />

2. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is an in-service<br />

candidate and as per the general recruitment rules, there is relaxation of maximum age limit for in-<br />

service applicants and if that is taken into consideration the applicant is within the age limit. He submits<br />

507

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!