10.12.2012 Views

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

Compilation Vol 3 Corrected (1-943).pmd - Goa Public Service ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

704<br />

MADHYA PRADESH ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, JABALPUR<br />

TRANSFERRED APPLICATION NO.1069/88<br />

D.D. 13.01.1994<br />

Baijnath Prasad Basadia ... Applicant<br />

Vs.<br />

State of M.P. & Ors. ... Respondents<br />

Direct Recruitment:<br />

Whether selection under old Rules is affected by subsequent amendment? – No<br />

Selection to 30 posts of Deputy Director of Agriculture was made by the Commission under M.P.<br />

Agricultural <strong>Service</strong>s (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 1966 – Out of the select list 25 candidates were<br />

appointed – 5 posts-4 under ST and 1 under GM category remained unfilled – Petitioners who were<br />

placed in the waiting list filed this application to appoint them against unfilled posts – The State contended<br />

that as per subsequent amendment dated 26.8.1988 filling up of posts of Deputy Director 100% by<br />

promotion – Accepting the contention of the petitioners that selection commenced under the old Rules<br />

will be governed by the unamended Rules has partly allowed the application with a direction to fill up<br />

remaining 5 vacancies by issuing appointment orders to the candidates in the waiting list in order of<br />

merit and to carry forward the additional vacancies under ST as per Rules.<br />

Held:<br />

Madhya Pradesh PSC<br />

Since the process of selection had commenced under the unamended rules, the rights of the<br />

petitioners have to be decided only in accordance with the unamended rules. The amendment<br />

subsequently made cannot be relied upon to deny the claims of the petitioners.<br />

Cases referred:<br />

1. AIR 1983 SC 1199 - Dr. Vinay Rampal Vs. State of Jammur & Kashmir.<br />

2. AIR 1988 SC 2068 - P. Ganeshwar Rao Vs. State of A.P.<br />

3. AIR 1990 SC 405 - P.Mahendran vs. State of Karnataka<br />

4. AIR 1991 SC 1612 - Shankasan Dash vs. Union of India<br />

5. AIR 1993 SC 582 - Y.V.Ranaiah Vs. Sreenivasan Rao & others & State of A.P. Vs.<br />

J.Sreenivasan Rao<br />

ORDER<br />

In response to advertisement No.0883 (Ann.A) issued by <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Service</strong> Commission, M.P., inviting<br />

applications for appointment of Deputy Director Agriculture the 3 petitioners applied for the same as<br />

members of general categories. Out of 30 posts five were reserved for Scheduled Caste, six for<br />

Schedule Tribes and the rest 10 for general category. The petitioners faced the selection and were<br />

placed in waiting list at Sl.No.3, 4 & 5 respectively. Copy of the select list issued by the <strong>Public</strong><br />

<strong>Service</strong> Commission on 27.7.86 is Annexure ‘B’. From the said list, twenty five candidates were<br />

appointed as Deputy Director of Agriculture on 21.2.1987 by appointment order dated 11.2.87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!