12.12.2012 Views

Geoinformation for Disaster and Risk Management - ISPRS

Geoinformation for Disaster and Risk Management - ISPRS

Geoinformation for Disaster and Risk Management - ISPRS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Approach to Dust Forecasting<br />

Sample satellite-based dust <strong>for</strong>ecast system<br />

Three steps are needed to produce reliable dust<br />

<strong>for</strong>ecasts (Figure 2). Step 1 is to assimilate satellite<br />

measurements over l<strong>and</strong> into a dust simulator<br />

(Nickovic et al., 2001); Step 2 optimizes model<br />

outputs to determine model per<strong>for</strong>mance; <strong>and</strong> Step 3<br />

requires public health authorities <strong>and</strong> health care<br />

providers to assess the versatility of dust<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong> health. The combined system adds a<br />

dust <strong>for</strong>ecast to the daily regional weather <strong>for</strong>ecast.<br />

Weather parameters include near surface properties,<br />

while dust parameters are drawn from Earth<br />

observing sensors. The system's per<strong>for</strong>mance has<br />

been verified <strong>and</strong> validated by comparing data<br />

obtained from ground monitors with modeled dust<br />

events between 2003 <strong>and</strong> 2008 (Morain <strong>and</strong> Sprigg<br />

2005; Morain <strong>and</strong> Sprigg 2007; Morain <strong>and</strong> Budge<br />

2008). These dust <strong>for</strong>ecasts are beginning to be used<br />

by health care professionals in the region.<br />

Figure 2: Step-wise procedure <strong>for</strong> <strong>for</strong>ecasting dust episodes <strong>for</strong> health surveillance.<br />

Metrics Wind Speed (m/s) Wind Direction (°) Temp (K) Definition<br />

Agreement<br />

Index<br />

0.74<br />

0.75<br />

0.74<br />

0.76<br />

0.71<br />

0.95<br />

1 �N N<br />

2 �M �O<br />

�<br />

�i<br />

i<br />

�M i �O<br />

�O<br />

i �O<br />

�<br />

�<br />

i�1<br />

i�1<br />

Table 1: Model per<strong>for</strong>mance metrics be<strong>for</strong>e <strong>and</strong> after data assimilation. Bold values are after data<br />

assimilation. For the equation M = modeled; O = observed<br />

Figure 3: The triptych shows three generations of model improvements <strong>for</strong> a dust storm across New Mexico <strong>and</strong> Texas on<br />

15-16 December, 2003. (left) the baseline model per<strong>for</strong>mance be<strong>for</strong>e satellite data were included; (middle) after satellite<br />

data replaced baseline parameters; (right) the same storm modeled by a higher resolution, weather <strong>for</strong>ecasting model.<br />

47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!