07.06.2022 Views

Pre-Colombian Jamaica: Caribbean Archeology and Ethnohistory

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

108 / Chapter 8.<br />

tend in recent discussion to have been overshadowed by the pictographs, but<br />

which were in fact of paramount importance to Duerden, who first published<br />

them (Duerden 1897:Plate VII, Figures 1 <strong>and</strong> 2). What he described as the<br />

“principal figure” was executed on a “projecting piece of rock” (Appendix 18).<br />

According to his description, “the eyes <strong>and</strong> mouth are represented, <strong>and</strong> the face<br />

is surrounded by two parallel three- sided incisions, producing somewhat the<br />

appearance of a thick hood. The outer incision is continued below, giving to<br />

the whole the resemblance of a shrouded human body.” Although they cannot<br />

be seen too well in this photograph, there are two other similar figures on<br />

either side of the “principal” one. Duerden also wrote, “A fallen piece of rock,<br />

measuring about four feet cube, lies upon the ground nearby, <strong>and</strong> bears similar<br />

carvings, but the figures are not so complete” (Appendix 19). This rock may<br />

not be easily visible today, but there definitely are parallels for these “shrouded<br />

human bodies” (in Duerden’s prescient phrase) elsewhere in the <strong>Caribbean</strong>.<br />

<strong>Caribbean</strong> Comparisons<br />

The comparisons suggested here are based on Roe’s work at the Puerto Rican<br />

sites (Roe 1991a, 1991b, 1999; cf. Siegel 2005). They relate both to the interpretation<br />

of individual figures <strong>and</strong> the placement of these figures within a<br />

broader conceptual framework. The interpretation of individual figures is assisted<br />

by his practice of breaking them down into their component parts, <strong>and</strong><br />

his acceptance of the idea of cross- media isomorphisms, such as suggested by<br />

Lee for the “ slit- eyed” head from God’s Well Junction #2 (CC10). The most<br />

telling parallel suggested by Roe is between the Long Beaked Bird at Caguana<br />

(petroglyph 7) <strong>and</strong> the triangular <strong>and</strong> roundel designs popular on Chicoid<br />

bowls (Roe 1991b:Figures 7 <strong>and</strong> 8). Among the anthropomorphic lithograph<br />

components distinguished by Roe, which also turn up in a <strong>Jamaica</strong>n context,<br />

it is worth drawing attention to the goggle eyes, the diadems, <strong>and</strong> the hairlines,<br />

among others (Roe 1991a:Figures 18, 21, <strong>and</strong> 23). The “pointed” hairline design<br />

gives rise to a heart- shaped face such as that illustrated by Lee from Gut<br />

River #1 (MC6). Roe illustrates similar examples from Caguana <strong>and</strong> the Cueva<br />

de La Mora (Roe 1991b:Figures 3, 5, <strong>and</strong> 6; 1999:Figures 7d <strong>and</strong> 10a). Diadem<br />

is the term used by Roe for the halo noted by Lee at Reynold Bent (EC19).<br />

Alternatively this is referred to as a headdress or a crown, as shown most strikingly<br />

at El Bronce (Roe 1991a:Figure 14) but also at Caguana <strong>and</strong> the Cueva<br />

de La Mora (Roe 1991b:Figures 3 <strong>and</strong> 6; 1999:Figures 10a, 29b, <strong>and</strong> 37). In<br />

Roe’s opinion, this accoutrement may have had a broader sociological signifi-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!