07.06.2022 Views

Pre-Colombian Jamaica: Caribbean Archeology and Ethnohistory

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

138 / Appendix A.<br />

tats, as follows: terrestrial 29 (22 percent), freshwater 1 (1 percent), beaches 4<br />

(3 percent), inshore estuarine 6 (5 percent), banks <strong>and</strong> reefs 82 (62 percent),<br />

offshore pelagic 10 (8 percent). The terrestrial remains consist exclusively of<br />

hutía. The single freshwater specimen represented is a turtle, Chrysemys cf. terrapen,<br />

one piece of shell of which was found. Sea turtles (Cheloniidae) were evidently<br />

located on the beaches. Inshore fish are not common <strong>and</strong> are dominated<br />

by jack (Caranx). Offshore pelagic species are likewise not numerous, but their<br />

presence is very significant. The majority consist of tuna (Thunnus) but there is<br />

also one dolphin (Coryphaena sp.). If the species represented is Coryphaena hippurus,<br />

this would indicate daytime fishing. By far the majority of the fish represented<br />

are bank <strong>and</strong> reef species. They are dominated by grouper (Serranidae).<br />

Other frequent species include snapper (Lutjanus), grunt (Haemulon), parrot<br />

fish (Scaridae), <strong>and</strong> triggerfish (Balistidae). One reef dwelling genus represented<br />

at Bengal, but not at the other sites considered by Wing, is the angelfish (Pomacanthus<br />

sp.). The sample from Bengal did not include any crabs. In general, the<br />

division of species by habitat is very similar to that at Rio Nuevo (Y4).<br />

References: AJ 1965, 2:1–2; 1965, 5:2; 1966, 8:1; 1973, 3:1; 1977, 1:2, 7;<br />

1978, 1:2; 1978, 4:2; Lee 1992; Silverberg et al. 1972; V<strong>and</strong>erwal 1968a:59–<br />

62, 123, 127 (Figure 7), 136.<br />

Retreat (A13)<br />

One of the first open- air sites in <strong>Jamaica</strong> to be excavated <strong>and</strong> described in some<br />

detail. According to Duerden (1897), investigations were first conducted by<br />

Miss Moulton Barrett, who found some pottery <strong>and</strong> other remains “on a ridge<br />

of l<strong>and</strong> connecting two hills.” The ridge was “covered with small mounds,” all<br />

of which produced material. Duerden commented that the “hill or ridge” was<br />

at an elevation of about 1,200 ft above sea level, one of a series of weathered<br />

white limestone “rounded elevations.” According to Duerden, it was known as<br />

“Cacique’s Ridge” or “Little Nigger- ground Hill,” the latter a reference to the<br />

fact that it had been used as a provision ground. Duerden himself conducted<br />

excavations at “numerous spots” in the locality. The next excavations were carried<br />

out by T. de Booy in 1913, <strong>and</strong> he suggested that the middens on the<br />

“original summit” of the hill, which by then was “practically level,” had probably<br />

been removed by the first two investigations (de Booy 1913:Figure 111).<br />

His own excavations were concentrated on the northern, eastern, <strong>and</strong> southern<br />

slopes. Another of the hitherto untouched middens was excavated by M. de<br />

Wolf in 1933 (de Wolf 1953). Lee relocated the site, <strong>and</strong> he refers to excavations<br />

by Father Osborne, but no written record of these is available.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!