07.06.2022 Views

Pre-Colombian Jamaica: Caribbean Archeology and Ethnohistory

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

130 / Chapter 10.<br />

dent in the affected areas. Radiological <strong>and</strong> CT examination shows that they<br />

spread throughout the diploe, producing an irregular surface. These pathological<br />

features indicate that the individual suffered from a treponemal disease,<br />

presumably syphilis. Intensive efforts were therefore made to date this<br />

specimen. Three radiocarbon dates have been obtained on two small pieces cut<br />

from the right occipital bone at the Oxford University radiocarbon laboratory<br />

as follows: 1101 ± 27 b.p. (OxA-12995), 1123 ± 25 b.p. (OxA-13614), <strong>and</strong><br />

1069 ± 23 b.p. (OxA-13664). As the laboratory comments, the combined dates<br />

when calibrated at one st<strong>and</strong>ard deviation give an estimated age range from<br />

a.d. 900 to 985. In addition, there are four further radiocarbon dates on an<br />

adjacent piece cut from the right occipital bone that were reported by the Beta<br />

Analytic laboratory. Two of these dates are similar to the ones quoted above,<br />

but in addition there are two older ones as follows: 1870 ± 40 b.p. <strong>and</strong> 2760 ±<br />

40 b.p.. Darden Hood comments that these inconsistent results show that this<br />

particular portion of bone must have been contaminated. There is no sign of<br />

contamination in the samples dated at Oxford.<br />

Quite apart from any question of contamination, a date for the skull older<br />

than a.d. 900–985 is considered unlikely on general grounds, both because it<br />

would be inconsistent with what is otherwise known of the <strong>Jamaica</strong>n archaeological<br />

sequence, <strong>and</strong> because elsewhere in the Greater Antilles the practice of<br />

artificial skull modification (manifest on this specimen) is unknown before the<br />

first millennium a.d. In Puerto Rico, for example, this is evident on the basis of<br />

the information from Maruca <strong>and</strong> from Tibes (Curet 2002; Rodríguez 1999).<br />

A date in the range a.d. 900–985 is in any case important for the debate concerning<br />

the origin of treponemal diseases in the <strong>Caribbean</strong>. It is not possible<br />

to be entirely sure of the <strong>Jamaica</strong>n archaeological context of this specimen. As<br />

noted in the CD- ROM, Lee stated that there were some pottery fragments in<br />

the cave that were “distinctly Redware style but without the red colouring.” But<br />

the Lee Collection includes at least one rim of White Marl type. The calibrated<br />

date range of the three samples from Oxford falls within the earlier part of the<br />

sequence at White Marl itself, <strong>and</strong> it might therefore be prudent to accept that<br />

as the most likely archaeological correlate of this specimen. Its significance in<br />

a <strong>Jamaica</strong>n <strong>and</strong> a <strong>Caribbean</strong> context is undeniable.<br />

Another example of new work being carried out on the isl<strong>and</strong> comes from<br />

Somerville cave, where Elizabeth Rega <strong>and</strong> her colleagues carried out excavations<br />

in 1996–1999 (Rega 2006). This cave is part of the Jackson’s Bay complex<br />

on Portl<strong>and</strong> Ridge in southern Clarendon (Fincham 1997:210–212, 336–<br />

337). The excavations took place in the Entrance Pit on the east, where the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!