07.06.2022 Views

Pre-Colombian Jamaica: Caribbean Archeology and Ethnohistory

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Principal Excavated Sites in <strong>Jamaica</strong> / 139<br />

Duerden excavated in the “upper dark loose earth” to a depth of up to 2 ft.<br />

At one point “a deposit of partially indurated bluish- grey ash <strong>and</strong> charcoal<br />

gave evidence of the use of fire by the builders of the refuse- heaps.” There were<br />

many l<strong>and</strong> snails (Helix acuta <strong>and</strong> Helix jamaicensis) <strong>and</strong> a few marine shells<br />

(Turbo pica, Strombus gigas, Codakia tigerina, Tellina fausta). He thought that<br />

the material from the site in general was similar to that from Stewart Castle<br />

(T4) <strong>and</strong> Wales (T6).<br />

De Booy reported <strong>and</strong> roughly mapped 16 middens, four of which he excavated.<br />

His most extensive excavations were in midden 4. He dug three trenches<br />

here, A (14 x 10 ft), B (38 x 10 ft), <strong>and</strong> C (10 x 10 ft). The principal trench B<br />

reached a maximum depth of 4 ft. An “ash deposit” 8 to 12 inches thick was<br />

found on the southern but not on the northern slope of the mound. Interestingly<br />

enough, de Booy stated that in excavating midden 4 his aim was not to<br />

obtain more archaeological material, but to procure “as accurate information<br />

as possible regarding the location of the huts <strong>and</strong> the exact limits of the shell<br />

<strong>and</strong> ash deposits” (de Booy 1913:429). By putting down test pits he ascertained<br />

that the ash deposit “extended round the southern slope, covering in all<br />

about half the circumference of the midden,” whereas deposits of shells covered<br />

“about 270 degrees of the circumference.” From the “direction of the shell<br />

<strong>and</strong> ash deposits” he concluded that the “aboriginal abode” (i.e., the “probable<br />

location of huts”) was on the top of the hummock <strong>and</strong> that “the inhabitants<br />

threw the refuse <strong>and</strong> discarded artifacts in three quadrants of the circle: in other<br />

words, in all directions save one, which afforded them at least one clean, clear<br />

space” in front of the dwellings.<br />

De Booy concluded that in all the middens at this locality at least 98 percent<br />

of the shells found were those of l<strong>and</strong> snails, the remainder being seashells.<br />

He identified three species of Pleurodont, Sagda alligans, two species of<br />

Arca, Livona pica, Fasciolaria distans, Avicula, <strong>and</strong> Strombus gigas. He also found<br />

bones of hutía <strong>and</strong> fish, which were not more closely identified. He drew particular<br />

attention to the presence of the remains of boat- shaped type pots with<br />

“b<strong>and</strong>ed edges,” “decorated h<strong>and</strong>les,” <strong>and</strong> elaborate “incised decorations,” as<br />

well as griddles with a diameter of about 14 in. There were also petaloid celts,<br />

hammer <strong>and</strong> other stones, <strong>and</strong> a single conch shell celt. Although differing in<br />

detail, V<strong>and</strong>erwal agreed with de Booy that “the Retreat site, in common with<br />

many others on the north coast, does have pottery decoration unique to <strong>Jamaica</strong>.”<br />

In 1933 M. de Wolf excavated another of the mounds that had not been investigated<br />

by de Booy (de Wolf 1953). “On the eastern brow of the hill, it lies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!