07.06.2022 Views

Pre-Colombian Jamaica: Caribbean Archeology and Ethnohistory

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Frameworks for <strong>Caribbean</strong> <strong>Pre</strong>history / 35<br />

Figure 5. Chronology of the peoples <strong>and</strong> cultures in the Bahamian Archipelago <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Greater Antilles (adapted from Rouse, 1992). Key as shown.<br />

what he termed his “old single- level system of classifying peoples <strong>and</strong> cultures”<br />

into a new “ bi- level system” (1992:127). In other words, the classification becomes<br />

hierarchical, <strong>and</strong> the notion of subseries as well as series is introduced<br />

(1990:59, 1991:684). “The ceramic styles, <strong>and</strong> the peoples <strong>and</strong> cultures they<br />

define, are grouped into subseries, whose names end in the suffix -an, <strong>and</strong> series,<br />

whose names end in the suffix -oid.” Thus the Cedrosan Saladoid subseries <strong>and</strong><br />

series (named after Cedros <strong>and</strong> Saladero respectively) marked the “first wave”<br />

of Ceramic Age advance through the <strong>Caribbean</strong>. It is this system that appears<br />

in the key to Figure 5 (<strong>and</strong> did not appear in 1964 <strong>and</strong> 1985). Such a double<br />

system does not appear to have a parallel in archaeological usage elsewhere.<br />

In either case, single or double, the implied meaning of the “lines of development”<br />

is that of local evolution (with a “common ancestor”) rather than immigration<br />

or replacement. Rouse consistently championed this interpretation

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!