07.06.2022 Views

Pre-Colombian Jamaica: Caribbean Archeology and Ethnohistory

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Principal Excavated Sites in <strong>Jamaica</strong> / 173<br />

other human bones. Eleven of these individuals were adult males, but the 12th<br />

skull belonged to an infant about 2 years old. Unlike the other skulls, it had<br />

no signs of cranial deformation. It was placed in a different location, by itself,<br />

with three small broken potsherds. There were five complete pots in the cave,<br />

four associated with one individual skeleton each, <strong>and</strong> one apparently “shared”<br />

by the remaining seven individuals. According to St. Clair, this showed that a<br />

“ranking” system was in operation. After the excavations, the burial goods <strong>and</strong><br />

skeletal remains were displayed at the White Marl Museum, but their present<br />

whereabouts is unknown.<br />

References: AJ 1967, 12:1; 1981, 2:1, 3; St. Clair 1970:7–10.<br />

Trelawny<br />

Stewart Castle (T4)<br />

First described by Duerden (1897), who noted that six distinct mounds were<br />

situated on a slight rise at this place, one of the mounds being larger than the<br />

rest. Excavations were carried out (presumably by Duerden rather than the<br />

l<strong>and</strong>owner Dr. Dewar), hence Howard’s statement (1950), that this was one<br />

of “the very few aboriginal sites in <strong>Jamaica</strong> at which any definite indications<br />

of stratigraphy have been reported.” The mounds, according to Duerden, covered<br />

an area of about 7 acres, but in the depressions between them only stray<br />

shells were encountered. “The extent of the area covered, <strong>and</strong> the thickness<br />

<strong>and</strong> quantity of the various deposits prove that the locality must have been frequented<br />

for long <strong>and</strong> various periods by numbers of the aboriginal Indians.”<br />

C. A. Matley again excavated the central mound in 1922 (Sherlock 1939).<br />

Mapped by Lee before 1968, reported to be undisturbed in 1973.<br />

Duerden carried out some excavations at all the mounds, but his description<br />

mainly relates to the central one. “In the principal mound digging was<br />

continued to a depth of 6 feet; remains being met with for 5 feet.” In the other<br />

mounds the depth of deposit varied between 4 <strong>and</strong> 2 ft. The upper soil was<br />

dark, with light- colored marly material beneath. Bedrock was not reached in<br />

any case. Distinct layering was visible in the central mound, “fine greyish- blue<br />

ashes” alternating with “burnt earth <strong>and</strong> soil,” few shells being found in the latter.<br />

Matley confirmed the existence of at least two layers of ash in this mound.<br />

He also reported two layers of flattish stones, which he took to be constructional<br />

material.<br />

Duerden mentioned the presence of numerous fish bones, as well as a few of<br />

hutía. The terrestrial snail Helix acuta was most common, followed by the ma-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!