07.06.2022 Views

Pre-Colombian Jamaica: Caribbean Archeology and Ethnohistory

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

by Phillip Allsworth-Jones

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

78 / Chapter 6.<br />

heights painstakingly worked out for each of the mapped sites by Lee (North,<br />

East, <strong>and</strong> Elevation) followed this system. Using his figures, the sites can be located<br />

on any of the old maps, which are still frequently used in <strong>Jamaica</strong>. Between<br />

1982 <strong>and</strong> 1991, a new series of 1:50,000 scale topographic maps was issued<br />

in 20 numbered sheets covering the entire isl<strong>and</strong> (Fincham 1997:Figure<br />

1B). This series is metric, that is, it employs kilometers <strong>and</strong> meters for both the<br />

grid <strong>and</strong> the contours, <strong>and</strong> it is generally used in newer works describing locations<br />

on the isl<strong>and</strong> (e.g., Donovan et al. 1995). As pointed out by Edward Robinson,<br />

“the projection is the same for the two systems,” hence, “converting from<br />

one to the other is a relatively simple matter in principle” (Robinson 1996). The<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard conversion formula is:<br />

X (eastings) metric = (X imperial × .3048) + 82,360<br />

Y (northings) metric = (Y imperial × .3048) + 28,080<br />

This formula has been applied to all of Lee’s figures, so new isl<strong>and</strong> grid references<br />

<strong>and</strong> elevations in meters are available for all the sites, in addition to Lee’s<br />

original measurements.<br />

While the positions of the sites can be <strong>and</strong> have been accurately recorded<br />

on the published maps of <strong>Jamaica</strong> using the above coordinates, it must be<br />

pointed out that there is a discrepancy between the conventional <strong>Jamaica</strong>n grid<br />

<strong>and</strong> the worldwide electronic grid now used by geographic information system<br />

(GIS) surveyors. Account needs to be taken of this in the fi eld if GPS equipment<br />

is used. The situation is fully explained by authors included in the References<br />

Cited in this volume (Miller 2003; Mugnier 2003; Stewart 2002, 2003a,<br />

2003b). Briefly, the problem arises because, as Miller puts it, in the past “spheroids<br />

of different dimensions have been used to represent the earth,” <strong>and</strong> these<br />

do not completely coincide with the ellipsoid which, as Stewart says, now constitutes<br />

the “world st<strong>and</strong>ard.” This is known as WGS, or World Geodetic System<br />

84. The projection used for the <strong>Jamaica</strong>n 1:50,000 grid is known as Clarke<br />

1866. It has its “true” origin at 18° North <strong>and</strong> 77° West. This point is to the<br />

west of Spanish Town. In order to avoid map positions being recorded both as<br />

“minuses” <strong>and</strong> as “pluses,” it was arbitrarily moved to a “false” origin, which in<br />

the metric version is situated 250 km west <strong>and</strong> 150 km south. All the site locations<br />

mentioned above are by reference to this arbitrary origin <strong>and</strong> they all appear<br />

as “pluses.” The “true” <strong>Jamaica</strong>n grid origin, as Stewart says, occurs at a<br />

point about 311 m north- northeast of the point that WGS 84 would determine<br />

as the correct position for 18° North <strong>and</strong> 77° West. That is the extent of the<br />

discrepancy. Stewart’s advice for GPS users is to “collect data in WGS 84 <strong>and</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!