journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
An Awkward Partnership: Turkey's Relations with the<br />
European Union in Comparative-Historical Perspective<br />
Ziya Önis<br />
105<br />
As the European Community (EC) evolved and experienced a process <strong>of</strong> <strong>de</strong>epening<br />
and wi<strong>de</strong>ning over time, Turkey, more than any other country on the European<br />
periphery, constituted a grave challenge to the European <strong>integration</strong> process. Historically,<br />
the European elites have been rather apprehensive about Turkey’s claims<br />
to be a full member <strong>of</strong> the Community right from the outset on the grounds <strong>of</strong> its<br />
size, its level <strong>of</strong> economic <strong>de</strong>velopment and at a more fundamental level, its alleged<br />
European i<strong>de</strong>ntity. More recently, concerns about the nature and quality <strong>of</strong> <strong>de</strong>mocratisation<br />
have ad<strong>de</strong>d another serious question mark as regards Turkey’s cre<strong>de</strong>ntials<br />
to become a member <strong>of</strong> the European Union (EU). In<strong>de</strong>ed, from a European point<br />
<strong>of</strong> view, if Turkey had not been so insistent about full membership, relations would<br />
have evolved in a fairly straight-forward and non-problematic manner, since there<br />
has never been any doubt concerning Turkey’s significance for the Community<br />
from a purely economic or security point <strong>of</strong> view. Turkey, as a Western-oriented,<br />
secular state with a large internal market and a significant geostrategic position<br />
appeared to be a natural partner for the Community. The natural dilemma for the<br />
European elites, a dilemma which has been evi<strong>de</strong>nt right from the beginning and<br />
has been carried on to the present day, is whether to treat Turkey as a natural<br />
“insi<strong>de</strong>r” or an important “outsi<strong>de</strong>r” in the context <strong>of</strong> the on-going European <strong>integration</strong><br />
project. Turkey’s single-min<strong>de</strong>d ambition to become a full-member <strong>of</strong> the<br />
EC/EU and the Union’s <strong>de</strong>sire to maintain an arm’s length relationship with Turkey<br />
have contributed to produce a difficult, tense and very <strong>of</strong>ten mutually disappointing<br />
relationship over the years.<br />
The objective <strong>of</strong> the present paper is to highlight the principal turning points in<br />
Turkey-EU relations over a period <strong>of</strong> four <strong>de</strong>ca<strong>de</strong>s, a process which has effectively<br />
been initiated in 1959 with Turkey’s application for full membership <strong>of</strong> the Community<br />
leading up to the critical Helsinki Summit <strong>of</strong> December 1999, where Turkey<br />
has been accepted as a candidate country for full EU membership. A central<br />
claim <strong>of</strong> the study is that Turkey–EU relations cannot be a<strong>de</strong>quately un<strong>de</strong>rstood<br />
simply on a bilateral basis without taking into consi<strong>de</strong>ration Europe’s evolving<br />
relations with other parts <strong>of</strong> its periphery in the course <strong>of</strong> the enlargement process.<br />
To be more precise, the southern enlargement process <strong>of</strong> the 1970s and the 1980s<br />
and the process <strong>of</strong> enlargement towards the east taking place during the 1990s are<br />
crucial to a proper un<strong>de</strong>rstanding <strong>of</strong> recent Turkey–EU relations as well as Turkey’s<br />
increasing feelings <strong>of</strong> isolation and exclusion, reaching a climax during the critical<br />
interlu<strong>de</strong> between the EU’s Luxembourg Summit <strong>of</strong> December 1997 and the<br />
Helsinki Summit <strong>of</strong> December 1999. 1<br />
1. The author would like to thank Kemal Kirișçi for his valuable comments on an earlier version <strong>of</strong><br />
this paper and Umut Türem for his able assistance.