30.12.2012 Views

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

44<br />

Birgit Aschmann<br />

Spain expected the EEC Council <strong>of</strong> Ministers to authorise the Commission to<br />

take up now regular negotiations with Spain within the next months. The German<br />

<strong>de</strong>legates promised that the Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Government would adopt the Spanish request.<br />

At the inter-governmental conference <strong>of</strong> 13 June 1966, the German Foreign minister<br />

actually tried to speed up the handling <strong>of</strong> the Spanish application by proposing<br />

to ask the Commission to present an account on the course <strong>of</strong> the exploratory talks<br />

with Spanish-government <strong>of</strong>ficials by the end <strong>of</strong> July. When the Commission refused<br />

this <strong>de</strong>adline too short to draw up a written account, Foreign minister Gerhard<br />

Schrö<strong>de</strong>r could at least achieve, that an oral general report should be <strong>de</strong>man<strong>de</strong>d<br />

for July. 30 The Fe<strong>de</strong>ral ministry <strong>of</strong> Foreign affairs did not intend to overrate this<br />

procedural success, after all Italy and the Benelux-countries had not changed their<br />

disapproving attitu<strong>de</strong>. 31 At least the <strong>de</strong>legate <strong>of</strong> the EEC Commission gave the<br />

Council as agreed an account on the state <strong>of</strong> the negotiations on 22 July, but again<br />

the written report promised for October was a long time in coming. When at the<br />

end <strong>of</strong> October high-ranking Spanish <strong>of</strong>ficials called on secretary <strong>of</strong> State Lahr, the<br />

account was not yet available. The Spanish han<strong>de</strong>d over a memorandum to the secretary<br />

<strong>of</strong> State with which the Spanish government had tried to bring its influence<br />

to bear on the work <strong>of</strong> the Commission. They withheld from their German interlocutor<br />

the request <strong>of</strong> the Commission, not to pass on this document to the governments<br />

<strong>of</strong> the member states, so as not to tempt them to influence the judgement <strong>of</strong><br />

the Commission. 32 The secretary <strong>of</strong> State thanked the Spanish <strong>of</strong>ficials for their<br />

confi<strong>de</strong>nce and promised to ask at the Council session the following day that the<br />

Commission’s report should be presented without <strong>de</strong>lay and that the issue should<br />

be handled at the next Council meeting in November. The German proposals apparently<br />

fell on fertile ground: On 23 November 1966 the Commission actually presented<br />

to the EEC Council its account on the exploratory talks with Spain.<br />

With regard to further proceeding the Commission brought up for discussion<br />

three mo<strong>de</strong>ls, with the first proposal amounting to an association – without explicitly<br />

mentioning it. The German ministry <strong>of</strong> Foreign affairs classified this solution as<br />

“unquestionably the best”. 33 As the possibility <strong>of</strong> an association would have found<br />

no support among the EEC partners, it had to be ruled out. The third mo<strong>de</strong>l, which<br />

proposed a limited tra<strong>de</strong> agreement, was rejected by the Germans as well as by the<br />

29. PAAA I A 4/391: “Arbeitsbesprechung im spanischen Aussenministerium am 29.3.1966”, note by<br />

Richard Breuer, head <strong>of</strong> the economic section <strong>of</strong> the German embassy in Madrid, attached to a report<br />

from the embassy <strong>of</strong> 13 April 1966.<br />

30. PAAA I A 4/342: “Spanien und EWG”, report by Stempel, 15 June 1966.<br />

31. PAAA I A 4/342: Stempel to the embassy <strong>of</strong> the Fe<strong>de</strong>ral Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany in Washington, 7<br />

July 1966.<br />

32. PAAA I A 4/343: “Das Gespräch <strong>de</strong>s Herrn Staatssekretärs mit Herrn Generaldirektor für Wirtschaftsangelegenheiten<br />

im spanischen Aussenministerium, Don Faustino Armijo, Herrn Generaldirektor<br />

für Internationale Organisationen, Marqués <strong>de</strong> Nerva, und <strong>de</strong>m spanischen Botschafter in<br />

Bonn, Herrn [José Sebastián] <strong>de</strong> Erice, am 25.10.1966 im Auswärtigen Amt”, minutes by Stempel.<br />

33. PAAA I A 4/343: “Beziehungen EWG–Spanien. Stichwortartige Stellungnahme zum Bericht <strong>de</strong>r<br />

Kommission an <strong>de</strong>n Rat über Sondierungsgespräche mit Spanien vom 23.11.1966”, note by Stempel,<br />

2 December 1966.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!