journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
INTRODUCTION<br />
Fernando Guirao<br />
The historiography <strong>of</strong> European <strong>integration</strong> has traditionally focused on five central<br />
questions – the emergence <strong>of</strong> the various European Communities, the process <strong>of</strong><br />
institution-building and policy consolidation <strong>of</strong> each community, the relations<br />
among the Six, their relations with the United Kingdom, and the role played by the<br />
United States. In recent years, the European countries left outsi<strong>de</strong> <strong>of</strong> the original<br />
Six, and the problems they consequently faced, have received increasing attention.<br />
The present volume <strong>of</strong> the Journal <strong>of</strong> European Integration History (JEIH) is an<br />
attempt to cast further light on countries rarely examined in standard historical<br />
accounts <strong>of</strong> European <strong>integration</strong>. The Editorial Board <strong>of</strong> the JEIH approved a special<br />
volume un<strong>de</strong>r the general theme <strong>of</strong> “Peripheral countries and the Integration <strong>of</strong><br />
Europe” because it was interested in analysing how the less resourceful countries<br />
among those exclu<strong>de</strong>d from the Treaty <strong>of</strong> Rome perceived, and reacted to the consequences<br />
<strong>of</strong> exclusion. The concept <strong>of</strong> periphery adopted here is quite simple: it<br />
concerns those countries that have received scant attention in historiographical<br />
terms (or in some cases, have been totally ignored).<br />
The case studies contained in this volume refer to Finland, Ireland, Norway,<br />
Portugal, Spain and Turkey. While a wi<strong>de</strong>r range <strong>of</strong> countries would have been <strong>de</strong>sirable,<br />
the JEIH Editorial Board was restrained by the papers presented and the<br />
outcome <strong>of</strong> the peer-review process. The time span covered varies from country to<br />
country. For Ireland and Finland the period between the signature <strong>of</strong> the Treaty <strong>of</strong><br />
Rome and European Community (EC)/European Union (EU) membership is treated<br />
as fully as the availability <strong>of</strong> archival sources permits. In the case <strong>of</strong> Norway, the<br />
author covers the period 1948-73 with the intention <strong>of</strong> explaining the gap between<br />
the Norwegian government, which successfully negotiated Community membership<br />
by 1972, and the people’s <strong>de</strong>cision to reject the accession terms in a referendum.<br />
Regarding Portugal, the author <strong>de</strong>als with the country’s European <strong>integration</strong><br />
policies during and immediately after Salazar’s autocratic reign. The fact that access<br />
to archives ends with the 1974 Revolution <strong>de</strong>termined the author’s <strong>de</strong>cision.<br />
The Spanish experience between 1957 and 1967, when <strong>of</strong>ficial Spain-European<br />
Economie Community (EEC) negotiations began, is analysed from the German<br />
viewpoint. Finally, in the contribution on Turkey, there is much historical background<br />
that helps in un<strong>de</strong>rstanding this country's present position vis-à-vis the<br />
European Union. Why some governments thought that further was teh soution to<br />
certain questions while others either ignored the problem or failed to appreciate the<br />
need for a specific response has become an area <strong>of</strong> intense research activity in the<br />
field <strong>of</strong> European <strong>integration</strong> <strong>history</strong>. Nor should it be taken for granted that the<br />
governments <strong>of</strong> some countries on the periphery <strong>of</strong> Western Europe <strong>de</strong>ci<strong>de</strong>d to join<br />
the European Community at all. For a long time, many observers in these countries<br />
had even questioned the need for institutional links <strong>of</strong> any kind. Specific circumstances,<br />
<strong>of</strong> an economic, social and political nature, must have led the governments<br />
5