journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
journal of european integration history revue d'histoire de l ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
112<br />
Ziya Önis<br />
By the late 1970s, however, a certain change <strong>of</strong> position could be discerned on<br />
the Turkish si<strong>de</strong>. There was growing concern in Turkey once Greece’s early accession<br />
to the Community became a serious possibility. Those concerns were further<br />
intensified as Spain and Portugal also emerged as serious conten<strong>de</strong>rs for inclusion<br />
in the Community after shedding <strong>of</strong>f their authoritarian past. 10 The i<strong>de</strong>a <strong>of</strong> applying<br />
for full-membership gained increasing support in Turkey. Growing domestic political<br />
and economic instability, however, <strong>de</strong>layed the application process with the Islamist<br />
element in the ruling coalition government, the National Salvation Party,<br />
representing a significant obstacle in this context. Finally, the collapse <strong>of</strong> the <strong>de</strong>mocratic<br />
regime in Turkey following the military take-over <strong>of</strong> September 1980 put an<br />
end to any chance <strong>of</strong> possible full-membership in the foreseeable future. 11<br />
Hence, one line <strong>of</strong> interpretation, which emerges from this comparative account,<br />
is that, Turkey, through its failure to apply for full-membership at the same<br />
time as Greece, missed a major opportunity. In other words, Turkey’s exclusion<br />
from the Community at the time <strong>of</strong> its “southern enlargement” constituted a case <strong>of</strong><br />
self-exclusion as opposed to exclusion by the Community itself. There is a certain<br />
element <strong>of</strong> truth in the conjecture that domestic political weaknesses and inaction<br />
on Turkey’s part resulted in its exclusion during the second phase <strong>of</strong> EC enlargement<br />
beyond its natural core. But, at the same time, it is not unambiguously clear<br />
that an early application on Turkey’s part would have resulted in an equally smooth<br />
and non-problematic accession as in the case <strong>of</strong> Greece, Portugal and Spain. Given<br />
Turkey’s size, the i<strong>de</strong>ntity issues involved and, on top <strong>of</strong> this, the negative reception<br />
<strong>of</strong> the Cyprus intervention in the West, it is very doubtful that an early application<br />
for Turkey would have created an equally favourable response in the Turkish case,<br />
as it has been the case for the three southern Mediterranean entrants.<br />
IV. Turkey's Encounters with the New Europe in the Post-1980 Era<br />
and the Customs Union<br />
The post-1980 era represents a period <strong>of</strong> radical transformation for both Turkey and<br />
the European Community with rather striking implications for their subsequent<br />
relations. In the Turkish case, the principal change was in the economic sphere. The<br />
heavily protected and inward-oriented economy <strong>of</strong> the 1960s and the 1970s was<br />
steadily transformed in the direction <strong>of</strong> a far more open and outward-oriented econ-<br />
10. On the Mediterranean enlargement <strong>of</strong> the Community involving Spain and Portugal see L. TSOU-<br />
KALIS, The European Community, op.cit., R. BIDELEUX and R. TAYLOR (eds.), European Integration<br />
and Dis<strong>integration</strong>: East and West, London, 1996, and C. PRESTON, Enlargement and<br />
Integration in the European Union, London, 1997.<br />
11. For a full documentation <strong>of</strong> this process see I. TEKELI and S. ILKIN, Türkiye ve Avrupa Toplulug˘u,<br />
op.cit., vol.1.