06.01.2013 Views

Ernest Dichter Papers - Hagley Museum and Library

Ernest Dichter Papers - Hagley Museum and Library

Ernest Dichter Papers - Hagley Museum and Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Accession 2407<br />

ERNEST DICHTER PAPERS<br />

Proposals & Studies<br />

SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE (cont’d)<br />

Researchers should be careful to observe the distinction between proposals <strong>and</strong><br />

studies. As noted, a substantial number of the proposals sent out failed to generate a<br />

response. Together, the proposals are most important as evidence of <strong>Dichter</strong>’s general<br />

stock of ideas (which may also be gleaned from his published writings) <strong>and</strong> the extent of<br />

his resourcefulness in seeking ways to apply them <strong>and</strong> sell his services to potential<br />

clients.<br />

The studies, on the other h<strong>and</strong>, offer a rare, if somewhat skewed entry into the minds<br />

of ordinary consumers in the U.S., Western Europe, <strong>and</strong> to a lesser extent Canada,<br />

Mexico <strong>and</strong> Israel. Unfortunately, <strong>Dichter</strong> himself destroyed his original raw data,<br />

including the full records of his depth interviews <strong>and</strong> the identity of his test subjects.<br />

Some supporting information survives only for a few of the very last studies. The only<br />

surviving example of something close to a full set of depth interviews is a series with<br />

residents of Arizona on their lifestyles <strong>and</strong> hobbies in 1985, <strong>and</strong> it does not match any of<br />

the completed, typed <strong>and</strong> bound studies. The surviving extracts that <strong>Dichter</strong> worked into<br />

his reports are still important <strong>and</strong> often make fascinating or occasionally outrageous<br />

reading, but the researcher should always remember that what remains has passed through<br />

the filter of Dr. <strong>Dichter</strong>’s own sensibilities. He clearly found the play of a Wednesday<br />

Addams-like little girl who imagines that her Barbie doll has a baby that soon dies more<br />

intriguing than less morbid scenarios.<br />

That said, <strong>Dichter</strong> was able to elicit rather c<strong>and</strong>id responses from his subjects, in the<br />

case of the woman who used an interview on home cooking to tear into her nagging<br />

mother-in-law <strong>and</strong> her (in her view) spoiled husb<strong>and</strong>, unexpectedly so. <strong>Dichter</strong> also paid<br />

more attention to class (as measured both by education <strong>and</strong> income) <strong>and</strong> racial/ethnic<br />

divisions in his research than Daniel Horowitz has implied. To the extent that the nature<br />

<strong>and</strong> test market of the product allowed, <strong>Dichter</strong> would try to include the differing<br />

responses of minorities, including African Americans, Puerto Ricans, French Canadians<br />

<strong>and</strong> the like. He also tried to balance his samples by age <strong>and</strong> gender, although in the latter<br />

case, the researcher needs to be ever-mindful of his tendency to classify women into a<br />

few types based on the polarity of the “new” woman <strong>and</strong> the traditional homemaker.<br />

15

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!