The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen
The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen
The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> discursive <strong>context</strong><br />
In the same vein, it has been emphasised by Tucker and Grim (2001) that the current<br />
environmental crisis is not only the result <strong>of</strong> economic, political and social factors. As<br />
it is equally informed by issues <strong>of</strong> moral and spiritual relevance, problem-solving<br />
strategies require broader philosophical understandings <strong>of</strong> humans as beings <strong>of</strong> nature.<br />
In search <strong>of</strong> more comprehensive ecological worldviews and effective environmental<br />
ethics, they argue that it is inevitable to draw from world religious traditions that have<br />
all provided conceptual frameworks for »interpretive direction, moral foundations for<br />
social cohesion, spiritual guidance for <strong>cultural</strong> expression, and ritual celebrations for<br />
meaningful life« (2001: xviii). In addressing the moral dilemmas resulting from the environmental<br />
crisis, distinctive ecological attitudes, values and visions for imagining<br />
humans as part <strong>of</strong>, not apart from, the natural world may provide a meaningful outlook.<br />
Despite abundant scientific knowledge and numerous political and economic<br />
statements, the authors see a lack <strong>of</strong> »religious commitment, moral imagination, and<br />
ethical engagement to transform the environmental crisis from an issue on paper to<br />
one <strong>of</strong> effective policy, from rhetoric in print to realism in action« (2001: xix).<br />
<strong>The</strong> interplay <strong>of</strong> worldview and ecology, which the above mentioned scholars<br />
have drawn their attention to, will remain <strong>of</strong> particular interest in the last part <strong>of</strong> the<br />
discursive <strong>context</strong>. Many <strong>of</strong> the presented ideas pertaining to the symbolic sphere <strong>of</strong> human<br />
experiences with nature will reappear in the following considerations that reveal<br />
different dimensions <strong>of</strong> indigenous knowledge. Intimately related to the outlined issues<br />
dealing with perceptions <strong>of</strong> nature and landscape, the topic will be discussed along<br />
four major lines, including questions <strong>of</strong> conceptual, empirical, symbolic and epistemological<br />
relevance. Again cutting across a number <strong>of</strong> disciplinary borders, the theme will<br />
be elaborated as a way <strong>of</strong> presenting the core ideas <strong>of</strong> anthropologists as to what indigenous<br />
knowledge is. <strong>The</strong> ways by which they have studied and approached the<br />
topic have changed during the course <strong>of</strong> the discipline's history and within different<br />
<strong>cultural</strong> settings. On the grounds <strong>of</strong> previously outlined anthropological fields, the<br />
chapter concentrates on recent arguments derived from different viewpoints, including<br />
development anthropology, ethnoecology, symbolic and spiritual ecology and anthropology<br />
<strong>of</strong> science and technology.<br />
85