The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen
The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen
The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Local expressions <strong>of</strong> indigenous knowledge<br />
That pre-Columbian life patterns generally persist in contemporary Q'eqchi' culture has<br />
been set out in various ethnographic accounts. 87 <strong>The</strong>re are few studies focussed on<br />
the social and psychological implications caused by the civil war and the partial destruction<br />
<strong>of</strong> the material, social and symbolic worlds <strong>of</strong> indigenous communities by<br />
the military regimes. 88 <strong>The</strong> decades <strong>of</strong> structural disempowerment had a devastating<br />
impact on Q'eqchi' community life, traditional beliefs and customary practices and led<br />
to a deep distrust in any state agency and institutions associated with the state.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Q'eqchi'es want to keep the government away from their life-world as far as possible. Everything<br />
related to the government and politics frightens them. <strong>The</strong>y do not consider themselves to belong to any<br />
national political entity and do not feel that there might be something to gain from joining a political<br />
party or project <strong>of</strong> whatever colour. (Siebers 1996: 66)<br />
In his study Creolization and Modernization at the Periphery Siebers further argues that any<br />
agency is only able to work with the people if it manages to create a relation <strong>of</strong> trust<br />
and confidence with the members <strong>of</strong> the particular community. However, the latter<br />
have <strong>of</strong>ten rejected, abandoned or undermined ›projects‹, which they regarded as an<br />
imposition on them. By questioning which role culture plays in the development<br />
processes, Siebers points to the normative character <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> ›development.<br />
It does not just refer to any process <strong>of</strong> social change, it supposes that within this<br />
process the actors concerned are becoming ›better <strong>of</strong>f‹ and that they are able to ›improve‹<br />
their situation. However, the problem remains <strong>of</strong> how to define what ›better<br />
<strong>of</strong>f‹ is. Siebers concludes that »the social actors themselves should be asked what they<br />
consider to be a significant improvement <strong>of</strong> their own situation« (1994: 209). <strong>The</strong>se<br />
thoughts lead to the last section <strong>of</strong> this chapter. It looks at cross-<strong>cultural</strong> communication<br />
in the <strong>context</strong> <strong>of</strong> protected area management, where traditional values coincide<br />
with the material and empirical concerns <strong>of</strong> science-based <strong>conservation</strong> research.<br />
87 A recent example is afforded by the investigations <strong>of</strong> Hatse and De Ceuster. <strong>The</strong>ir findings<br />
appeared in Cosmovisión y espiritualidad en la agricultura q'eqchi' (2001a). Further writings include the<br />
works <strong>of</strong> Wilson (1995) and Siebers (1996).<br />
88 Among these are the commendable works <strong>of</strong> Wilson. See for instance his paper Machine Guns and<br />
Mountain Spirits. <strong>The</strong> Cultural Effects <strong>of</strong> State Repression among the Q'eqchi' <strong>of</strong> Guatemala (1990). More generally,<br />
the later study Maya Resurgence in Guatemala. Q'eqchi' Experiences (1995) emphasises continuities<br />
and changes in religious life and identity.<br />
215