06.01.2013 Views

The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen

The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen

The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

108<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>cultural</strong> <strong>context</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>biodiversity</strong> <strong>conservation</strong><br />

sult <strong>of</strong> a great number <strong>of</strong> decisions and selective incorporations <strong>of</strong> previous ideas, beliefs and images,<br />

but at the same time destructive <strong>of</strong> other possible frames <strong>of</strong> conceptualisation and understanding.<br />

Thus, it is not an accumulation <strong>of</strong> facts but involves ways <strong>of</strong> construing the world. Nor is knowledge<br />

ever fully unified or integrated in terms <strong>of</strong> an underlying <strong>cultural</strong> logic or system <strong>of</strong> classification.<br />

Rather it is fragmentary, partial, and provisional in nature and people work with a multiplicity <strong>of</strong><br />

understandings, beliefs and commitments. (Arce & Long 1992: 212f.)<br />

That knowledges cannot be divorced from the historically specific forms <strong>of</strong> social intercourse,<br />

communication and organisation has been widely asserted. Among others,<br />

McCarthy (1996) reminds that knowledge itself is a historical construct. She has provided<br />

a definition <strong>of</strong> knowledges as »any and every set <strong>of</strong> ideas and acts accepted by<br />

one or another social group or society <strong>of</strong> people – ideas and acts pertaining to what<br />

they accept as real for them and for others« (1996: 23). Its working premise, she<br />

comments, is that social reality itself is in process and is formed out <strong>of</strong> the prevailing<br />

knowledges <strong>of</strong> a society or group <strong>of</strong> people. In this sense, the next chapter will explore<br />

aspects <strong>of</strong> relevance within larger social and historical frames. Leaving behind<br />

the highly diverse theoretical ideas, the turn towards the local <strong>context</strong> again entails different<br />

levels <strong>of</strong> analysis. Building upon the central attributes <strong>of</strong> indigenous knowledge<br />

as described above, the following chapter specifically considers the role <strong>of</strong> national<br />

policies and integrationist objectives that defined the major parameters <strong>of</strong> the Guatemalan<br />

governments towards the indigenous population in the past. It synthesises<br />

some general ethnological data and explores the influence <strong>of</strong> dynamic configurations<br />

<strong>of</strong> state policies and institutional environments. This analysis may provide a matrix <strong>of</strong><br />

culture, history, social movements and environmental change that local resource use<br />

patterns are embedded in.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!