06.01.2013 Views

The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen

The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen

The cultural context of biodiversity conservation - Oapen

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Local expressions <strong>of</strong> indigenous knowledge<br />

5.1.4 Further subsistence activities<br />

<strong>The</strong> various tasks associated with agri<strong>cultural</strong> and forest gathering patterns are widely<br />

augmented by further subsistence activities such as hunting and fishing. Besides the<br />

gathering <strong>of</strong> plants and timber products, the forest fauna is <strong>of</strong> major importance for<br />

the families' nutritional needs. In the two sample communities it has long been common<br />

to hunt in the forests adjacent to the fields. To do so, fruit trees have been<br />

planted in the forest and the guamil to attract wild animals that are regularly hunted by<br />

several farmers. It is also very common to hunt the wild animals that damage the<br />

crops on the fields under cultivation. As the aforementioned study undertaken by a<br />

group <strong>of</strong> biologists <strong>of</strong> the USAC has shown, hunting follows an annual cycle, just like<br />

other subsistence activities. In general, it is practised during the months <strong>of</strong> less agri<strong>cultural</strong><br />

activity after the most time intensive work has been completed in February,<br />

March, July and August. As a younger informant in San Benito explained, he went<br />

hunting every fifteen days in the time between June and August when there was less<br />

work to do. When the cobs start to appear, another farmer commented, wild animals<br />

would frequently invade the fields in search for food. Thus, by protecting food crops<br />

from predating animals, hunting, apart from its nutritional value, also contributes to<br />

subsistence indirectly. <strong>The</strong> applied techniques include traps and weapons; dogs are<br />

also widely kept for this purpose. Not all men hunt regularly. Some informants reported<br />

that they do not hunt for lack <strong>of</strong> time or appropriate weapons. Several would<br />

ask others who own weapons or dogs to hunt on their plots. A few informants explained<br />

that they avoid the practice as they observed that the number <strong>of</strong> animals has<br />

decreased notably due to the reduction <strong>of</strong> their habitat and overhunting. Specifically<br />

they referred to species such as the tapir (Tapirus bairdii), called danto, which has almost<br />

disappeared in the area and is only to be found within the limits <strong>of</strong> the National Park.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the most abundant species in the area is the armadillo (Dasypus novemcinctus).<br />

Table 5.6 Animals commonly hunted by farmers in San Benito<br />

Spanish / Q'eqchi' English Scientific name<br />

Armadillo /ib'oy armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus<br />

Cabro / yuk brocket deer Mazama Americana<br />

Coche de monte / k'iche' aaq peccary Tayassu pecari<br />

Cotuza / aaqam Dasyprocta punctata<br />

Mapache / ow racoon Procyon lotor<br />

Pizote / sis coati Nasua narica<br />

Taltuza / b'a gopher Orthogeomys sp.<br />

Tepezcuintle / halaw Agouti paca<br />

Venado / kej white-tail deer Odocoileus virginianus<br />

Source: Field identification with Sindy Hernández and informants<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!