12.01.2013 Views

immunology of infectious and parasitic diseases - XXXVII Congress ...

immunology of infectious and parasitic diseases - XXXVII Congress ...

immunology of infectious and parasitic diseases - XXXVII Congress ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IDENTIFICATION OF M. LEPRAE DNA IN HOUSEHOLD CONTACTS<br />

RESIDENT IN GOVERNADOR VALADARES – MG, BRAZIL<br />

RAFAEL SILVA GAMA(1); THALISSON ARTUR RIBEIRO GOMIDES(1);<br />

EUZENIR NUNES SARNO(2); MILTON OZÓRIO MORAES(2); GULNARA<br />

PATRICIA BORJA CABRERA(1); LUCIA ALVES DE OLIVEIRA FRAGA(1).<br />

(1). Núcleo de Pesquisa em Imunologia – Faculdade de Ciências da Saúde -<br />

Universidade Vale do Rio Doce – UNIVALE – Gov Valadares, MG;<br />

(2). Fundação Oswaldo Cruz –FIOCRUZ/RJ.<br />

Introduction: Classical bacteriological methods for identification <strong>of</strong> pathogenic<br />

bacteria can not be applied to the diagnosis <strong>of</strong> leprosy, especially the inability <strong>of</strong><br />

in vitro cultivation <strong>of</strong> M. leprae. The histopathology <strong>and</strong> smear microscopy has<br />

been used as auxiliary methods for the clinical classification <strong>of</strong> cases. The<br />

advent <strong>of</strong> molecular biology techniques with good specificity <strong>and</strong> high sensitivity<br />

has been evaluated as tools for early diagnosis <strong>of</strong> leprosy. Objective: The<br />

objective <strong>of</strong> this study was to evaluate the qPCR as a tool to identify M. leprae,<br />

<strong>and</strong> to compare the levels <strong>of</strong> bacterial DNA in samples <strong>of</strong> dermal scrapings <strong>and</strong><br />

blood <strong>of</strong> patients with leprosy <strong>and</strong> their household contacts. Methodology <strong>and</strong><br />

Results: The qPCR was performed to amplify 16S rRNA fragments, specific for<br />

the M. leprae. A total <strong>of</strong> 156 individuals participated in this study, 43 index<br />

cases <strong>and</strong> 113 household contacts. PCR was positive with 16S rRNA primer in<br />

21 (48.84%) <strong>of</strong> 43 patients diagnosed with leprosy while the baciloscopic<br />

method was positive in only 13 (30.23%) patients. In relation to household<br />

contacts 27 (23.89%) <strong>of</strong> 113 subjects had bacterial DNA. The levels <strong>of</strong> bacterial<br />

DNA contacts were similar to those <strong>of</strong> DNA <strong>of</strong> PB. We conclude that qPCR was<br />

able to detect bacterial DNA in biological samples in which the baciloscopic<br />

method was negative. Furthermore, a positive qPCR smear was higher than in<br />

index cases under 5 lesions. We found that 23.89% <strong>of</strong> the contacts showed M.<br />

leprae DNA in qPCR <strong>and</strong> that the level <strong>of</strong> bacterial DNA in these subjects was<br />

similar to the group level CPB, DM 1 <strong>and</strong> DM 2. Rather, the level <strong>of</strong> bacterial<br />

DNA was significantly lower than in group MB. Conclusion: We suggest the<br />

incorporation <strong>of</strong> this technique in the health system, as well as monitoring <strong>and</strong><br />

prophylactic treatment <strong>of</strong> contacts positive qPCR as strategies for early<br />

diagnosis <strong>and</strong> control <strong>of</strong> leprosy.<br />

Financial support: CNPq-DECIT/2008, FIOCRUZ/RJ.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!