29.01.2013 Views

Growing Together: Economic Integration for an Inclusive and - escap

Growing Together: Economic Integration for an Inclusive and - escap

Growing Together: Economic Integration for an Inclusive and - escap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

that c<strong>an</strong> account <strong>for</strong> externalities, both<br />

positive, such as network externalities, or<br />

negative, such as emissions of pollut<strong>an</strong>ts or<br />

other damaging environmental effects <strong>an</strong>d,<br />

there<strong>for</strong>e, it is best placed to provide the<br />

fin<strong>an</strong>cing.<br />

However, even if governments wish to invest<br />

in infrastructure, they may have limited<br />

capacities to do so. One constraint could be<br />

difficulties in accessing funding or a desire<br />

to limit the size of the public debt. Although<br />

public debt ratios are not particularly high in<br />

the Asia-Pacific region, governments wishing<br />

to take on signific<strong>an</strong>tly more debt to invest in<br />

infrastructure would need to ensure that they<br />

c<strong>an</strong> do so in a sustainable way in projects with<br />

high social returns. In general, government<br />

fin<strong>an</strong>cing is desirable as long as the social<br />

return is higher th<strong>an</strong> the private return.<br />

Beyond that, government expenditure c<strong>an</strong><br />

lead to <strong>an</strong> inefficient allocation of funds.<br />

National development b<strong>an</strong>k lending<br />

M<strong>an</strong>y governments invest in infrastructure<br />

through national development b<strong>an</strong>ks. This<br />

may help reduce governments’ budget<br />

constraints because development b<strong>an</strong>ks are<br />

generally funded not only from government<br />

budgets but also by issuing governmentbacked<br />

bonds – although the guar<strong>an</strong>tees<br />

still constitute a contingent liability <strong>for</strong> the<br />

government. Development b<strong>an</strong>ks have<br />

institutional adv<strong>an</strong>tages since they c<strong>an</strong><br />

employ specialized personnel to m<strong>an</strong>age<br />

funding <strong>an</strong>d lending activities.<br />

In addition to funding national infrastructure<br />

projects, national development b<strong>an</strong>ks<br />

typically invest in other developmentrelated<br />

activities, such as agriculture, rural<br />

development <strong>an</strong>d public services, <strong>an</strong>d fin<strong>an</strong>ce<br />

small <strong>an</strong>d medium-sized enterprises or<br />

micro-enterprises. Some development b<strong>an</strong>ks<br />

are extremely large <strong>an</strong>d during the global<br />

fin<strong>an</strong>cial crisis were used <strong>for</strong> countercyclical<br />

spending. The Brazilli<strong>an</strong> Development B<strong>an</strong>k<br />

(BNDES) is the world’s largest <strong>an</strong>d most<br />

effective development b<strong>an</strong>k. In 2010, it lent<br />

more th<strong>an</strong> five times as much as the World<br />

B<strong>an</strong>k (table IV.2).<br />

Bilateral <strong>an</strong>d multilateral agencies<br />

Poorer countries tend to rely on bilateral<br />

<strong>an</strong>d multilateral agencies <strong>for</strong> investment in<br />

infrastructure. Some of these agencies offer<br />

support, especially to the neediest countries,<br />

in the <strong>for</strong>m of gr<strong>an</strong>ts, but more typically they<br />

provide long-term lo<strong>an</strong>s, usually co-fin<strong>an</strong>cing<br />

with national governments, other agencies or<br />

the private sector. In Asia <strong>an</strong>d the Pacific, ADB<br />

is one of the principal multilateral sources.<br />

It signs country partnership strategies with<br />

governments <strong>an</strong>d subsequently offers them<br />

funding <strong>for</strong> infrastructure projects according<br />

to country allocations <strong>an</strong>d sectoral priorities.<br />

Most ADB lo<strong>an</strong>s are on commercial terms<br />

from its ordinary capital resources (OCR), but<br />

the B<strong>an</strong>k also offers lo<strong>an</strong>s on concessional<br />

terms through its Asi<strong>an</strong> Development Fund.<br />

The ADB also fin<strong>an</strong>ces private-sector projects<br />

without government guar<strong>an</strong>tees, though in<br />

2010, such lending made up less th<strong>an</strong> 15 per<br />

cent of its new lending. Such lo<strong>an</strong>s are also<br />

often accomp<strong>an</strong>ied by technical assist<strong>an</strong>ce to<br />

help design <strong>an</strong>d implement projects.<br />

In addition to supporting national governments,<br />

the ADB promotes regional<br />

cooperation in infrastructure. The CAREC<br />

programme, established in 1997, <strong>for</strong> example,<br />

focuses on infrastructure projects in the area<br />

of tr<strong>an</strong>sport, energy, trade facilitation <strong>an</strong>d<br />

customs services. Since 1991, there have also<br />

been proposals to set up a North-East Asia<br />

B<strong>an</strong>k <strong>for</strong> Cooperation <strong>an</strong>d Development with<br />

the participation of China, the Democratic<br />

People’s Republic of Korea, Jap<strong>an</strong>, Mongolia,<br />

the Republic of Korea, <strong>an</strong>d the Russi<strong>an</strong><br />

Federation, but the idea has yet to bear<br />

fruit. More recently, the leaders of Brazil, the<br />

Russi<strong>an</strong> Federation, India, China <strong>an</strong>d South<br />

Africa (BRICS) proposed at their March 2012<br />

Summit in New Delhi to establish a BRICS<br />

Development B<strong>an</strong>k to fin<strong>an</strong>ce infrastructure<br />

development in developing countries.<br />

Private-sector funding<br />

Infrastructure investment also comes from<br />

the private sector. Indeed, this is generally<br />

more efficient th<strong>an</strong> public disbursement,<br />

particularly when the fin<strong>an</strong>cial returns<br />

are likely to be high <strong>an</strong>d investment costs<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!