Growing Together: Economic Integration for an Inclusive and - escap
Growing Together: Economic Integration for an Inclusive and - escap
Growing Together: Economic Integration for an Inclusive and - escap
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER ONE<br />
5<br />
The case <strong>for</strong> regional economic integration in Asia <strong>an</strong>d the Pacific<br />
Rising inequality threatens social<br />
cohesion<br />
The region has made signific<strong>an</strong>t progress<br />
towards achieving m<strong>an</strong>y of the Millennium<br />
Development Goals, particularly in reducing<br />
poverty (figure I.2); between 1990 <strong>an</strong>d 2009,<br />
the me<strong>an</strong> headcount poverty ratio fell from<br />
50 to 22 per cent. 14 But Asia <strong>an</strong>d the Pacific<br />
is still home to close to one billion people<br />
living on less th<strong>an</strong> $1.25 a day. Indeed, the<br />
bulk of the world’s deprived people, including<br />
those without access to s<strong>an</strong>itation <strong>an</strong>d<br />
undernourished children, live in the Asia-<br />
Pacific region (figure I.3). 15<br />
Although economic growth has led to <strong>an</strong><br />
increase in the incomes of the poor, the<br />
incomes of the rich have increased more<br />
swiftly. As a result, the region is now facing<br />
rising inequality with potential threats to social<br />
cohesion. Since the 1990s, the population-<br />
FIGURE TITLE<br />
I.2. Country groups on <strong>an</strong>d off track <strong>for</strong> the MDGs<br />
weighted me<strong>an</strong> Gini coefficient <strong>for</strong> the region<br />
as a whole increased from 32.5 to 37.5, <strong>an</strong>d<br />
only 10 of the 25 countries that enjoyed<br />
positive <strong>an</strong>nual economic growth succeeded<br />
in reducing income inequality. This rise in<br />
inequality partly reflects the tr<strong>an</strong>sition from<br />
agriculture to industry <strong>an</strong>d services, in which<br />
there are more signific<strong>an</strong>t wage differentials,<br />
as well as rapid technological ch<strong>an</strong>ge, which<br />
puts a premium on higher levels of education<br />
<strong>an</strong>d leaves fewer opportunities <strong>for</strong> low-skilled<br />
workers. At the same time, workers have<br />
experienced a decreased bargaining power. 16<br />
Inequalities in income are accomp<strong>an</strong>ied by<br />
inequalities in access to s<strong>an</strong>itation, education,<br />
health services, food, electricity <strong>an</strong>d credit.<br />
There are also marked differences between<br />
households in urb<strong>an</strong> <strong>an</strong>d rural areas, between<br />
women <strong>an</strong>d men, <strong>an</strong>d between different social<br />
<strong>an</strong>d ethnic groups. Indeed, socioeconomic<br />
Source: ESCAP, ADB <strong>an</strong>d UNDP, Asia-Pacific Regional MDG Report 2011/12, table I-1, p. 9 (B<strong>an</strong>gkok, United Nations <strong>an</strong>d ADB, 2012).