29.01.2013 Views

Growing Together: Economic Integration for an Inclusive and - escap

Growing Together: Economic Integration for an Inclusive and - escap

Growing Together: Economic Integration for an Inclusive and - escap

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• The Lao People’s Democratic Republic<br />

should be able to benefit from the<br />

exp<strong>an</strong>sion in the dem<strong>an</strong>d <strong>for</strong> copper<br />

<strong>for</strong> which the market is growing by<br />

$1.8 billion per year, mostly in China.<br />

Similarly, the market <strong>for</strong> “copper <strong>an</strong>d<br />

copper alloys, worked” is growing across<br />

the region, by about $534 million per<br />

year. The main exp<strong>an</strong>ding markets are:<br />

China at $273 million, Thail<strong>an</strong>d at $57<br />

million <strong>an</strong>d Turkey at $45 million.<br />

Barriers to trade<br />

Even though intraregional trade has been<br />

increasing, it continues to face a number of<br />

barriers. Traditionally, countries relied on<br />

tariffs to protect domestic producers against<br />

<strong>for</strong>eign competition, but increasingly the<br />

instruments of choice are various non-tariff<br />

<strong>an</strong>d behind-the-border barriers.<br />

Tariffs<br />

There is no doubt that six decades of<br />

multilateral trade negotiations have led to<br />

a signific<strong>an</strong>t reduction of so-called most<br />

favoured nation (MFN) tariffs, to more<br />

clarity about types of tariffs, <strong>for</strong> example<br />

ad valorem versus specific tariffs, <strong>an</strong>d to a<br />

higher predictability on levels of duties to be<br />

charged. Historically, applied import tariffs in<br />

most of the Asia-Pacific economies have never<br />

been very high, on average, as m<strong>an</strong>y of these<br />

economies needed to import raw materials<br />

<strong>an</strong>d intermediate products to sustain their<br />

export dynamism. In 2009, the average<br />

applied MFN rate in the region was 8 per cent,<br />

with only Maldives having <strong>an</strong> average MFN<br />

applied rate of about 20 per cent <strong>an</strong>d most<br />

other economies having average rates of less<br />

th<strong>an</strong> 10 per cent.<br />

While the average level of applied MFN tariff<br />

rates have been reduced signific<strong>an</strong>tly, m<strong>an</strong>y<br />

countries in the region still have higher<br />

average bound rates. The unweighted average<br />

of bound tariffs <strong>for</strong> the selected Asia-Pacific<br />

economies is 28 per cent, but the variation<br />

of average bound tariffs around this me<strong>an</strong> is<br />

very large, r<strong>an</strong>ging from less th<strong>an</strong> 5 per cent<br />

to more th<strong>an</strong> 100 per cent. Furthermore, m<strong>an</strong>y<br />

countries still do not bind 100 per cent of<br />

their tariffs. On average, the extent of imports<br />

covered by bound tariffs or binding coverage<br />

in Asia <strong>an</strong>d the Pacific is 88 per cent, but the<br />

coverage could be as low as 15 per cent.<br />

The lower the binding coverage, the more<br />

flexibility a country has in introducing higher<br />

levels of applied import tariffs on products<br />

that do not have tariff bindings. While this<br />

increases “policy space” of individual countries,<br />

it also makes the trading environment less<br />

stable <strong>an</strong>d more unpredictable.<br />

Notably, average tariffs are based on so-called<br />

dutiable imports excluding all zero-rate MFN<br />

tariffs. However, the share of zero-rate MFN<br />

bound or applied tariffs is signific<strong>an</strong>t, more so<br />

in high-income th<strong>an</strong> in low-income countries<br />

in a region. For most countries, non-agriculture<br />

tariffs lines have a larger proportion of bound<br />

zero duty th<strong>an</strong> agriculture lines. As m<strong>an</strong>y as<br />

thirteen economies in the region apply zero<br />

duty to more th<strong>an</strong> 50 per cent of their nonagriculture<br />

tariff lines, including Singapore,<br />

Hong Kong, China <strong>an</strong>d Macao, China where the<br />

duty-free share is 100 per cent. For agriculture<br />

products, 10 countries apply zero duty to more<br />

th<strong>an</strong> 50 per cent of their agriculture tariff lines.<br />

As in the case of positive tariff rates, countries<br />

tend to apply more zero tariffs th<strong>an</strong> what they<br />

are willing to bind at zero-rates, me<strong>an</strong>ing that<br />

they wish to preserve the flexibility to invoke<br />

duty on most of the tariff lines <strong>for</strong> which they<br />

currently impose no duties.<br />

Non-tariff measures<br />

There is much less data on non-tariff measures<br />

(NTMs), which prevents comparisons across<br />

countries or over time. The WTO provides<br />

regularly updated in<strong>for</strong>mation on technical<br />

barriers to trade (TBT) through a publicly<br />

accessible database (TBT_IMS). In addition<br />

to TBT there are m<strong>an</strong>y other NTMs, which<br />

should be properly monitored. However,<br />

while there have been m<strong>an</strong>y attempts to<br />

org<strong>an</strong>ize comprehensive inventories of NTMs,<br />

none of these initiatives have yet to produce<br />

databases equivalent to tariff schedules.<br />

Technical barriers to trade are, in principle,<br />

non-discriminatory <strong>an</strong>d apply to all trading<br />

partners. The other barriers to trade arise<br />

from time-consuming customs procedures,<br />

con<strong>for</strong>mity assessments, non-tr<strong>an</strong>sparency,<br />

arbitrariness, poor facilitation of trade at<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!