Exotic Aquatic Organisms - International Development Research ...
Exotic Aquatic Organisms - International Development Research ...
Exotic Aquatic Organisms - International Development Research ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 1. Summary of introductions of fish species in the world (derived from Welcomme 1981). Columns ito 5 in order are, number<br />
of species introduced into region beyond its native distribution range; global introductions where the species has been introduced into<br />
at least 4 continents; introduced from Asia; introduced into Asia and inter-Asian introductions. As-refers to originating from Asia;<br />
'Oc' refers to Oceania.<br />
Family 1 2 3 4 5<br />
ACIPENSERIDAE<br />
ANABANTIDAE<br />
ANGUILUDAE<br />
ATHERIMDAE<br />
BAGRIDAE<br />
CENTRARCHIDAE<br />
CENTROPOMIDAE<br />
CHANNIDAE<br />
CHANTDAE<br />
CICHLIDAE<br />
CLARIIDAE<br />
CLUPEIDAE<br />
COBITIDAE<br />
COREGONTDAE<br />
CYPRJMDAE<br />
CYPRINODONTIDAE<br />
ELEOTRIDAE<br />
ERYTHRINIDAE<br />
ESOCIDAE<br />
GOBIIDAE<br />
ICTALURIDAE<br />
LORICARIIDAE<br />
ORYZIATIDAE<br />
OSMERIDAE<br />
OSPHRONEMIDAE<br />
OSTEOGLOSSIDAE<br />
PERCICHTHYIDAE<br />
PERCIDAE<br />
POECILIDAE<br />
SALMONTDAE<br />
SCIAENTDAE<br />
SILURTDAE<br />
UMBRIDAE<br />
2<br />
6<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1<br />
12<br />
1<br />
1<br />
I<br />
36<br />
2<br />
2<br />
1<br />
3<br />
37<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
4<br />
2<br />
1<br />
3<br />
12<br />
18<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
Controversies<br />
When compared to the information available on finfish that on other aquatic organisms is<br />
scanty. Hitherto there had been no attempts to document such introductions either globally or<br />
regionally, even though very detrimental effects have been recorded with respect to some. A case<br />
in point is the introduction of the water fern Salvinia into Asia, which has had the most negative<br />
impact brought about by an exotic animal or plant (Bhukaswan 1980). On the other hand, with<br />
respect to finfish species the status of individual introductions have been assessed and views on<br />
their beneficial or harmful effects remain controversial.<br />
In this controversy Oreochromis mossambicus (Peters), the aquatic chicken of the 1960's<br />
(Ling 1977) is now considered a nuisance species, globally (Welcomme 1984) except perhaps in<br />
Sri Lanka (De Silva 1985; 1987) and in Papua New Guinea (West and Glucksman 1967; Coates<br />
1985). Of course in hind sight one could suggest that the results could have been better if<br />
O.niloticus was introduced. During the 50's and early 60's O.niloticus was relatively unknown<br />
and O.mossambicus was the choice species. In these countries this species remains the backbone<br />
of an important artisanal fishery and therefore a source of protein for the poor, and there are no<br />
reports on environmental degradation caused by this species. Comparable controversies exist<br />
1<br />
4<br />
6As<br />
1<br />
3<br />
2<br />
5<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
1<br />
6<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
1<br />
1<br />
2<br />
1<br />
1<br />
6<br />
2<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3;20c<br />
i;20c<br />
1;lOc<br />
3:lOc<br />
1: lOc<br />
1<br />
12<br />
3