MEDICINA NUCLEARE - Crosetto Foundation

[89] Moses W W 2007 Recent advances and future advances in time-of-flight PET Nucl.
Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 580 919–24
[90] Surti S, Karp J S, Popescu L M, Daube-Witherspoon M E and Werner M 2006
Investigation of time-of-flight benefit for fully 3-D PET IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 25 529–
38
[91] Cho S, Ahn S, Li Q, Leahy RM. Exact and approximate Fourier rebinning of PET data
from time-of-flight to non time-of-flight. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Feb 7;54(3):467-84.
Conti M. State of the art and challenges of time-of-flight PET. Phys Med. 2008 Dec 18
[92] Surti S, Karp JS. Experimental evaluation of a simple lesion detection task with time-of-
flight PET. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Jan 21;54(2):373-84.
[93] Defrise M, Panin V, Michel C, Casey ME. Continuous and discrete data rebinning in time-
of-flight PET. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Sep;27(9):1310-22.
[94] Cho S, Ahn S, Li Q, Leahy RM. Analytical properties of time-of-flight PET data. Phys
Med Biol. 2008 Jun 7;53(11):2809-21.
[95] Surti S, Karp JS. Design considerations for a limited angle, dedicated breast, TOF PET
scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jun 7;53(11):2911-21
[96] Karp JS, Surti S, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Muehllehner G. Benefit of time-of-flight in
PET: experimental and clinical results. J Nucl Med. 2008 Mar;49(3):462-70.
[97] Surti S, Kuhn A, Werner ME, Perkins AE, Kolthammer J, Karp JS. Performance of Philips
Gemini TF PET/CT scanner with special consideration for its time-of-flight imaging
capabilities. J Nucl Med. 2007 Mar;48(3):471-80.
[98] Vandenberghe S, Daube-Witherspoon ME, Lewitt RM, Karp JS. Fast reconstruction of
3D time-of-flight PET data by axial rebinning and transverse mashing. Phys Med Biol. 2006
Mar 21;51(6):1603-21.
[99] Conti M, Bendriem B, Casey M, Chen M, Kehren F, Michel C, Panin V. First experimental
results of time-of-flight reconstruction on an LSO PET scanner. Phys Med Biol. 2005 Oct
7;50(19):4507-26
[100] Yamaya T, Obi T, Yamaguchi M, Ohyama N. High-resolution image reconstruction
method for time-of-flight positron emission tomography. Phys Med Biol. 2000
Nov;45(11):3125-34.
SISTEMI CON CAMPO DI VISTA ESTESO E MODELLIZZAZIONI
[101] Couceiro M, Ferreira NC, Fonte P. Sensitivity assessment of wide Axial Field of View
PET systems via Monte Carlo simulations of NEMA-like measurements. Nuclear instruments &
methods in physics research. 2007, vol. 580, no1, pp. 485-488
[102] L. Eriksson, D. Townsend, M. Conti, M. Eriksson, H. Rothfuss, M. Schmand, M.E. Casey,
B. Bendriem. An investigation of sensitivity limits in PET scanners. Nuclear instruments &
methods in physics research. A 580 (2007) 836-842.
[103] R.D. Badawi et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 47 (2000) 1228.
[104] M. Watanabe et al., IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., 51 (2004) 796.
[105] L. Eriksson, D. Townsend, M. Conti, C.L. Melcher, M. Eriksson, B. W. Jakoby, H.
Rothfuss, M. Schmand. Potential for large axial field of view positron camera systems.
Nuclear Science Symp. Conf. Rec., 2008, IEEE, Pag. 1632-1636.
[106] Badawi, R.D.; Kohlmyer, S.G.; Harrison, R.L.; Vannoy, S.D.; Lewellen, T.K. The effect of
camera geometry on singles flux, scatter fraction andtrues and randoms sensitivity for
cylindrical 3D PET-a simulation study Nuclear Science, IEEE Transactions on Volume 47,
Issue 3, Jun 2000 Page(s):1228 – 1232
[107] Wai-Hoi Wong et al. J Nucl Med. 2008; 49 (Supplement 1):411P
GATING RESPIRATORIO
[108] Park SJ, Ionascu D, Killoran J, Mamede M, Gerbaudo VH, Chin L, Berbeco R.Evaluation
of the combined effects of target size, respiratory motion and background activity on 3D
and 4D PET/CT images. Phys Med Biol. 2008 Jul 7;53(13):3661-79. Epub 2008 Jun 19.
[109] Dawood M, Buther F, Jiang X, Schafers KP.Respiratory motion correction in 3-D PET
data with advanced optical flow algorithms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008 Aug;27(8):1164-
AIMN - Notiziario elettronico di Medicina Nucleare ed Imaging Molecolare, Anno V, n 2, 2009 pag. 64/85