11.06.2013 Views

Edição e distribuição www.designeditora.com.br Tipologia Adobe ...

Edição e distribuição www.designeditora.com.br Tipologia Adobe ...

Edição e distribuição www.designeditora.com.br Tipologia Adobe ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

62<<strong>br</strong> />

Revista de Estudos so<strong>br</strong>e Teatro de Formas Animadas<<strong>br</strong> />

MÓIN-MÓIN<<strong>br</strong> />

Alternative puppet ‘bodies’<<strong>br</strong> />

Cariad Astles<<strong>br</strong> />

Central School of Speech and Drama<<strong>br</strong> />

(London – England)<<strong>br</strong> />

I understand that this issue of Móin-Móin is dedicated to discussion of<<strong>br</strong> />

the puppet in collaboration with other art forms, or within interdisciplinary<<strong>br</strong> />

work. My intention, therefore, within this article, is to discuss the loss or alteration<<strong>br</strong> />

of the puppet body within contemporary puppet theatre: the blurring<<strong>br</strong> />

of boundaries within cross-disciplinary work has developed to such an extent<<strong>br</strong> />

that the puppet itself has frequently be<strong>com</strong>e hard to locate within work which<<strong>br</strong> />

designates itself as ‘puppet theatre’; instead, the puppet body has been replaced<<strong>br</strong> />

by a multiply articulated body created from different sources, which generates<<strong>br</strong> />

its own meaning. By this I mean that the unified puppet figure has been<<strong>br</strong> />

replaced in many cases by shadows, projections and multimedia technology;<<strong>br</strong> />

by objects; by matter; and by animated scenic action which creates its own<<strong>br</strong> />

perception of a puppet ‘body’.<<strong>br</strong> />

Approximately fifteen years ago in the U there was a move towards<<strong>br</strong> />

interdisciplinarity in puppet theatre; re<strong>com</strong>mendations were made by arts<<strong>br</strong> />

funding organisations that, in order to increase its status and subsequently<<strong>br</strong> />

funding and popular perception, puppetry needed to collaborate extensively<<strong>br</strong> />

with professionals from other art forms including writing, design, music and<<strong>br</strong> />

performance to develop itself as an art form and to increase its profile within<<strong>br</strong> />

adult theatre. This, of course, was part of an international movement loosely<<strong>br</strong> />

located within postmodernism, where discrete and separate performances modes<<strong>br</strong> />

were dissolved to create new meanings of theatre, where boundaries were<<strong>br</strong> />

blurred and where the notions of character, narrative and plot were challenged<<strong>br</strong> />

by intertexuality and collage. Sectors of the puppet theatre <strong>com</strong>munity in the<<strong>br</strong> />

U, however, took up the gauntlet, <strong>com</strong>missioning professionals from a wide<<strong>br</strong> />

range of artistic practices to develop collaboration and experimentation. In<<strong>br</strong> />

terms of funding and recognition, this was partially successful in that puppetry<<strong>br</strong> />

in the U now enjoys a significantly improved status and audience and is no<<strong>br</strong> />

longer pigeonholed into children’s entertainment. An offshoot of this process,<<strong>br</strong> />

however, has been that puppetry is seen less as the realm of the specialist puppeteer,<<strong>br</strong> />

and more as an extra skill within the actor’s CV, and what is seen as<<strong>br</strong> />

puppetry within live performance is more loosely defined than ever. A further<<strong>br</strong> />

development has taken place which is that the term puppet theatre, previously

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!