22.02.2013 Views

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

216<br />

disadvantages include the negative effects of physical punishment and<br />

negative reinforcement (acute and chronic); consequences of being<br />

‘dominated’ by the keeper, such as reduced fertility; transient relationships<br />

between elephant and keeper (due to high staff turnover and limited working<br />

hours); and health problems induced by training ‘power behaviours’ (e.g.<br />

head stands; hind-leg stands). Protected contact is said, at least by some, to<br />

encompass most of the pros of traditional training, but with the added<br />

advantages of allowing elephants to choose whether or not to participate in<br />

training sessions (cf. traditional training where 100% compliance is required);<br />

not using physical punishment and improving the behaviour of problem<br />

animals. It has been argued, however, that not all veterinary procedures can<br />

be undertaken and elephants do not gain sufficient physical exercise. No<br />

contact systems are rare, but could potentially provide the most naturalistic<br />

form of care. Such systems negate the use of punishment as no training is<br />

undertaken, however, veterinary procedures cannot be undertaken without<br />

the use of anaesthesia and some say that elephants do not get sufficient levels<br />

of physical exercise or mental stimulation, said to occur during training. These<br />

purported pros and cons of different management regimes need to be<br />

investigated to quantify the effects of each system on elephant health,<br />

behaviour and reproduction. In addition, the response of elephants to their<br />

keepers in these different regimes should be determined, particularly in<br />

traditional systems, to try and determine whether elephants really do respond<br />

to their keepers as another group member (or indeed group leader).<br />

Foot and joint problems: incidence, severity and risk factors<br />

Foot and joint problems appear to be very common in zoo elephants, although<br />

their incidence does not yet appear to have been quantified. Aspects<br />

suggested to be associated with these problems include: hard, unyielding<br />

substrates; long periods of chaining; nutrient deficiency; excessive body<br />

weight; the performance of ‘power behaviours’ (e.g. head stands; hind-leg<br />

stands); stereotypic behaviour and general stress. Factors thought to alleviate<br />

them include regular foot care (which may differ in different management<br />

systems); regular exercise and access to mud wallows and natural substrates.<br />

The influence of these various factors on foot and joint health needs to be<br />

investigated, in addition to quantifying the incidence and severity of these<br />

problems in zoo elephants.<br />

Stereotypic behaviour: incidence, frequency, source behaviours and risk<br />

factors<br />

The stereotypic behaviour of zoo elephants has not received much attention,<br />

but from the data that are available, 40% of elephants studied showed these<br />

behaviours to some degree, albeit at a generally low frequency. Research on<br />

orphaned elephants suggests the behaviour stems from restricted movement<br />

and possibly impaired social interaction. Due to the possible link to welfare,<br />

the incidence and severity of stereotypies needs to be scientifically quantified,<br />

possible causal factors identified and investigated.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!