22.02.2013 Views

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

populations using this method; the method is also very time-consuming and<br />

labour-intensive. <strong>Elephants</strong> have also been counted using transect line<br />

techniques, however dung counts are reckoned to be the most accurate<br />

(Barnes 2001). A study in Tamilnadu in India compared direct-count transect<br />

methods with dung counts (Varman et al 1995). This found that although<br />

direct counts were faster they tended to overestimate elephant numbers; direct<br />

counts are very difficult to conduct in forest habitats. A good summary of the<br />

methodology using dung counts is given in Davies (2002).<br />

ELEPHANT POACHING<br />

Poaching for ivory is a problem for both African and Asian elephants, but<br />

probably greater for the African owing to the fact that females also have tusks.<br />

Ivory has been a valued substance from time immemorial and humans have<br />

been making and trading in ivory artefacts from some 10,000 years. As males<br />

tend to be poached more than females this can have a long term effect on the<br />

sex ratio of populations. Tuskers in southern India have been particularly<br />

badly hit (Sukumar et al 1998) and only abut 7.5% of bulls in Sri Lanka are<br />

tuskers (Santiapillai et al 1999). A survey carried out in Asian countries in<br />

1999 [Stiles & Martin 2002 #1680] found worked ivory for sale throughout<br />

Asia. In Thailand more items were found for sale than in four African<br />

countries (which included Egypt) and imported African elephant ivory was<br />

also found. In Nepal, India and Sri Lanka, where there is a total ban, very<br />

little worked ivory was on display in shops [Stiles & Martin 2002 #1680]. The<br />

ivory trade is thought to be the major cause of the drop in population of<br />

African elephants from an estimated 1.3 million in 1979 to around 626,000 in<br />

1989 (Douglas-Hamilton 1987). Milner-Gulland (1994) examined rates of<br />

decline of the African elephants which indicated that the rapid decline since<br />

1950, particularly from 1970, was due to the increase in poaching for the Far<br />

Eastern ivory markets. This increase started to drop around 1987. Egypt is<br />

considered the major African country selling illegal ivory, much of it poached<br />

in central and West Africa (Martin 2000). A survey carried out in Africa<br />

showed that the prices for ivory decreased as a result of the ban but there is<br />

still significant trade throughout the continent (Stiles and Martin 2001).<br />

Although elephant hides are traded TRAFFIC research has failed to uncover<br />

any linkages between elephant poaching and the trade in hides<br />

(www.traffic.org).<br />

Elephant culling has effects on social organization and behaviour due to the<br />

fact that animals with larger tusks are selected first. It has been estimated that<br />

336-388 tuskers have been poached over a 20 year period from the Periyar<br />

Reserve of southern India (Sukumar et al 1998). This has resulted in a<br />

depletion of the male population and a drop in fecundity of females. It also<br />

appeared that a proportion of females, older than 15, were non-reproductive.<br />

Similar evidence from Africa shows populations with skewed sex ratios (50<br />

females to one male) and the proportion of females showing signs of<br />

pregnancy and accompanied by recent offspring being reduced (Dobson and<br />

Poole 1998). Evidence from Queen Elizabeth Park in Uganda suggested that<br />

social structure was breaking down caused by stress due to factors like<br />

excessive poaching. Heavily poached populations characteristically have<br />

21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!