Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo
Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo
Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• In FC positive and negative reinforcement and punishment are used; in<br />
PC positive reinforcement is used with rewards of favoured foods or<br />
social reinforcers, physical discipline is never used.<br />
• In FC keepers enforce compulsory compliance from the elephant with<br />
the use of the ankus; in PC animals are trained with a target and<br />
compliance is voluntary.<br />
• In FC a whistle is never used. Verbal commands are the norm; in PC a<br />
whistle is used as a bridge and to terminate a behaviour, although<br />
verbal commands may also be used.<br />
There has been confusion over the difference in the two methods. Helpful<br />
FAQs are listed by Priest (1994) and Desmond & Laule (1993) point out the<br />
dangers of mixing the two systems by using free contact techniques in a<br />
confined contact setting, continuing with the use of the ankus. This can create<br />
the impression that the trainer is trying to dominate the animal when he is no<br />
longer in a position to so do and this can be dangerous. However, under<br />
certain circumstances an ankus can be used and the institution should<br />
document the scenarios when the use of the ankus is beneficial and useful.<br />
The elephant needs to be in a small area when the ankus is used in protected<br />
contact as the technique will not work when the animal can move away, i.e.<br />
the ankus can only be used when the elephant is in a chute (Fig. 11, b).<br />
It is probably preferable to consider elephant management as being a<br />
continuum from no contact to elephants being walked outside their enclosures<br />
by handlers in a free contact situation. Between the management techniques<br />
of a handler working in contact with the elephant to the handler working only<br />
through or behind a barrier there are a range of methods used<br />
There are also a variety of barriers used in management. None are completely<br />
safe and training of staff re positioning in relation to the barrier is of vital<br />
importance. Some barriers allow physical contact to differing degrees<br />
between elephant and keeper. In some cases the elephant can physically<br />
interact with the keeper. In this case the elephant can easily injure the handler<br />
and strict safety and training protocols have to be adhered to. It is generally<br />
agreed that it is easier to manage an elephant through a barrier if it has<br />
previously been directly handled (i.e. in a free contact system).<br />
Since the PC system was introduced, elephant management and training has<br />
developed into a continuum of management techniques, which vary in the<br />
amount of, direct or potentially direct, physical contact that is allowed<br />
between elephant and handler. Within a facility different variations of the<br />
continuum may be used based on the disposition and sex of the elephant and<br />
the handler’s level of training or relationship to a particular elephant. The<br />
management technique, or techniques within the continuum, that a collection<br />
uses is important but more important is the ability of the handlers to safely<br />
achieve or exceed the established minimum standards of elephant care.<br />
In some cases the elephant can physically interact with the handler, with<br />
differing degrees, through barriers. Reasons given for this are: temperament<br />
of the elephant, the ability of the handler to use the additional techniques and<br />
tools, opportunity to demonstrate affection and greater ability for research<br />
93