22.02.2013 Views

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• In FC positive and negative reinforcement and punishment are used; in<br />

PC positive reinforcement is used with rewards of favoured foods or<br />

social reinforcers, physical discipline is never used.<br />

• In FC keepers enforce compulsory compliance from the elephant with<br />

the use of the ankus; in PC animals are trained with a target and<br />

compliance is voluntary.<br />

• In FC a whistle is never used. Verbal commands are the norm; in PC a<br />

whistle is used as a bridge and to terminate a behaviour, although<br />

verbal commands may also be used.<br />

There has been confusion over the difference in the two methods. Helpful<br />

FAQs are listed by Priest (1994) and Desmond & Laule (1993) point out the<br />

dangers of mixing the two systems by using free contact techniques in a<br />

confined contact setting, continuing with the use of the ankus. This can create<br />

the impression that the trainer is trying to dominate the animal when he is no<br />

longer in a position to so do and this can be dangerous. However, under<br />

certain circumstances an ankus can be used and the institution should<br />

document the scenarios when the use of the ankus is beneficial and useful.<br />

The elephant needs to be in a small area when the ankus is used in protected<br />

contact as the technique will not work when the animal can move away, i.e.<br />

the ankus can only be used when the elephant is in a chute (Fig. 11, b).<br />

It is probably preferable to consider elephant management as being a<br />

continuum from no contact to elephants being walked outside their enclosures<br />

by handlers in a free contact situation. Between the management techniques<br />

of a handler working in contact with the elephant to the handler working only<br />

through or behind a barrier there are a range of methods used<br />

There are also a variety of barriers used in management. None are completely<br />

safe and training of staff re positioning in relation to the barrier is of vital<br />

importance. Some barriers allow physical contact to differing degrees<br />

between elephant and keeper. In some cases the elephant can physically<br />

interact with the keeper. In this case the elephant can easily injure the handler<br />

and strict safety and training protocols have to be adhered to. It is generally<br />

agreed that it is easier to manage an elephant through a barrier if it has<br />

previously been directly handled (i.e. in a free contact system).<br />

Since the PC system was introduced, elephant management and training has<br />

developed into a continuum of management techniques, which vary in the<br />

amount of, direct or potentially direct, physical contact that is allowed<br />

between elephant and handler. Within a facility different variations of the<br />

continuum may be used based on the disposition and sex of the elephant and<br />

the handler’s level of training or relationship to a particular elephant. The<br />

management technique, or techniques within the continuum, that a collection<br />

uses is important but more important is the ability of the handlers to safely<br />

achieve or exceed the established minimum standards of elephant care.<br />

In some cases the elephant can physically interact with the handler, with<br />

differing degrees, through barriers. Reasons given for this are: temperament<br />

of the elephant, the ability of the handler to use the additional techniques and<br />

tools, opportunity to demonstrate affection and greater ability for research<br />

93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!