22.02.2013 Views

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

Elephants Elephants - Wildpro - Twycross Zoo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

82<br />

3.8.2 Elephant Management Systems<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

There is a continuum of methods for keeping elephants in captive<br />

environments. These range from the no contact situation where elephants are<br />

not handled unless restrained or under chemical sedation. In this situation<br />

elephants are treated as other zoo animals with very limited training. In<br />

Europe a minority of collections operate this form of management – in Britain<br />

Howlett’s and Knowsley keep elephants under this sort of regime.<br />

<strong>Elephants</strong> are more commonly managed through more intensive training and<br />

contact with keeping staff. The two basic systems for managing elephants this<br />

way have been termed, protected and free contact, which entail two different<br />

forms of training and management (Olson et al 1994). Free contact (FC)<br />

involves staff being in with the elephants in their enclosure and in protected<br />

contact (PC) the staff are outside the elephants’ area. Although there is a<br />

diversity of approaches, even within specific management systems, all share<br />

the common training method of operant conditioning. A full explanation of<br />

terms used during training and handling is provided in the section on training<br />

and in Appendix 1, Section 6.1.<br />

TRAINING<br />

It is useful to clarify the training methodology used in elephant training before<br />

giving details of how they are applied in free and protected contact. A useful<br />

background to the topic is given by Karen Pryor (1999) and by Dineley (1990).<br />

Elephant training relies upon the use of classical and operant conditioning.<br />

Conditioning is a process involved in learning in which an animal forms an<br />

association between a previously significant stimulus and previously neutral<br />

stimulus or response. Reinforcement is the process by which certain responses<br />

become strengthened as an animal learns i.e. it supports the development of a<br />

conditioned response during learning (McFarland 1981).<br />

In classical conditioning an association is formed between a significant stimulus<br />

such as the sight of food and a neutral stimulus such as a flashing light. It is<br />

used to train, pair, condition or create an association between a stimulus that<br />

normally would not have any effect on the animal and an animal’s response.<br />

A well-known example is Pavlov’s dogs that would begin to salivate upon<br />

hearing a bell, in anticipation of receiving food. Initially the bell meant<br />

nothing to the dogs. After successive feedings immediately following the<br />

sound of the bell, the dogs began to associate the bell with being fed. Thus the<br />

dogs began to salivate immediately upon hearing the bell, regardless of<br />

whether food was present. The bell is the equivalent of the bridge used by<br />

animal trainers. This is an example of positive conditioning or reinforcement.<br />

Conditioning can also use negative reinforcement, e.g. if the onset of a tone<br />

precedes the delivery of a puff of air to the eye of a rabbit the tone will come<br />

to elicit a blink of the eyelid as a conditioned response. Thus in Pavlov’s dogs<br />

the food is a positive reinforcer and the rabbit’s eye the puff of air is a negative

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!