Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
119<br />
Chapter 6<br />
is infinite (with <strong>the</strong> induced electrical field decreasing from <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
stimulation focal point), in practice <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electrical field capable <strong>of</strong> disrupting<br />
normal neuronal activity is limited (i.e. it is anatomically and functionally specific).<br />
For example, TMS <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> motor cortex results in visible and measurable (via MEPs)<br />
motor twitches in <strong>the</strong> muscles. This effect however is nei<strong>the</strong>r random nor non-<br />
specific – TMS to <strong>the</strong> motor cortex has been shown to evoke muscular twitches from<br />
selective muscle groups in a manner compatible with <strong>the</strong> functional layout <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
motor homunculus, with stimulation at target sites varying from 0.5 to 1 centimetres<br />
apart leading to selective activation <strong>of</strong> each muscle type (Singh, Hamdy, Aziz, and<br />
Thompson, 1997; Wassermann, McShane, Hallet, and Cohen, 1992). The functional<br />
focality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> method is fur<strong>the</strong>r demonstrated in <strong>the</strong> visual domain, where a similar<br />
spatial resolution (less than 1 cm on <strong>the</strong> scalp) has been reported through <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> physiological effects induced by TMS stimulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary visual cortex<br />
(V1; c.f. Walsh and Cowey, 2000). Moreover, stimulation to V1 leads to <strong>the</strong><br />
generation <strong>of</strong> phosphenes, which are spatially distributed in a manner that corresponds<br />
with <strong>the</strong> retinotopic organisation <strong>of</strong> V1 (Kammer, 1999).<br />
Outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary motor and sensory areas, <strong>the</strong> effective spatial<br />
resolution 3 <strong>of</strong> TMS has regularly been demonstrated by functional dissociations<br />
following TMS to spatially discrete regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cortex. For example, in <strong>the</strong> same<br />
subjects, TMS targeted at <strong>the</strong> right occipital face area (thought to be functionally<br />
specialised for face processing) has been shown to impair face but not body or object<br />
recognition, while stimulation at a region <strong>of</strong> lateral occipital cortex (LO; thought to be<br />
functionally specialised for object processing) has been shown to impair object but<br />
not face or body recognition, whilst stimulation at <strong>the</strong> right extra-striate body area<br />
3 It is <strong>of</strong> note, that TMS does not only stimulate <strong>the</strong> neuron in a 1cm region, ra<strong>the</strong>r, it is that this<br />
represents <strong>the</strong> physiologically effective resolution <strong>of</strong> TMS.