23.02.2013 Views

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

Mirror-touch synaesthesia: the role of shared ... - UCL Discovery

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

119<br />

Chapter 6<br />

is infinite (with <strong>the</strong> induced electrical field decreasing from <strong>the</strong> centre <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

stimulation focal point), in practice <strong>the</strong> size <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> electrical field capable <strong>of</strong> disrupting<br />

normal neuronal activity is limited (i.e. it is anatomically and functionally specific).<br />

For example, TMS <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> motor cortex results in visible and measurable (via MEPs)<br />

motor twitches in <strong>the</strong> muscles. This effect however is nei<strong>the</strong>r random nor non-<br />

specific – TMS to <strong>the</strong> motor cortex has been shown to evoke muscular twitches from<br />

selective muscle groups in a manner compatible with <strong>the</strong> functional layout <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

motor homunculus, with stimulation at target sites varying from 0.5 to 1 centimetres<br />

apart leading to selective activation <strong>of</strong> each muscle type (Singh, Hamdy, Aziz, and<br />

Thompson, 1997; Wassermann, McShane, Hallet, and Cohen, 1992). The functional<br />

focality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> method is fur<strong>the</strong>r demonstrated in <strong>the</strong> visual domain, where a similar<br />

spatial resolution (less than 1 cm on <strong>the</strong> scalp) has been reported through <strong>the</strong> study <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> physiological effects induced by TMS stimulation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary visual cortex<br />

(V1; c.f. Walsh and Cowey, 2000). Moreover, stimulation to V1 leads to <strong>the</strong><br />

generation <strong>of</strong> phosphenes, which are spatially distributed in a manner that corresponds<br />

with <strong>the</strong> retinotopic organisation <strong>of</strong> V1 (Kammer, 1999).<br />

Outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> primary motor and sensory areas, <strong>the</strong> effective spatial<br />

resolution 3 <strong>of</strong> TMS has regularly been demonstrated by functional dissociations<br />

following TMS to spatially discrete regions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cortex. For example, in <strong>the</strong> same<br />

subjects, TMS targeted at <strong>the</strong> right occipital face area (thought to be functionally<br />

specialised for face processing) has been shown to impair face but not body or object<br />

recognition, while stimulation at a region <strong>of</strong> lateral occipital cortex (LO; thought to be<br />

functionally specialised for object processing) has been shown to impair object but<br />

not face or body recognition, whilst stimulation at <strong>the</strong> right extra-striate body area<br />

3 It is <strong>of</strong> note, that TMS does not only stimulate <strong>the</strong> neuron in a 1cm region, ra<strong>the</strong>r, it is that this<br />

represents <strong>the</strong> physiologically effective resolution <strong>of</strong> TMS.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!